Applying Quantitative Techniques to Evaluate the Level of Sustainability for Physical Dimension of Urban Form in Sanandaj City, Iran

Applying Quantitative Techniques to Evaluate the Level of Sustainability for Physical Dimension of Urban Form in Sanandaj City, Iran

Farzin Charehjoo Ho Chin Siong 

Faculty of Built Environment, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Page: 
275–287
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V8-N3-275–287
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

This paper aims to understand and evaluate the sustainability of physical dimension of urban form in rapidly growing urban areas and presents some quantitative methods (Shannon’s Entropy and Holden Apportioning Technique) to measure the level of sustainability for urban form as a practical implication. The rapid urbanization in Iran in the second half of the 20th century has mostly manifested itself in the emergence of large cities and issue of sustainable urban form is becoming ever more important, taking into consideration the contemporary urban population growth and the concern of sustainable development. The Sanandaj City is located on the west- ern side of Iran, and has a population of about 400,000. There has been rapid urbanization during the last three decades in the city and it is therefore chosen as a case study. The results of these measurements indicate that in order to achieve sustainable urban form, the urban policies for development should be changed. A more rational and focused approach is required in development of the urban areas to achieve efficacy and sustainability.

Keywords: 

quantitative models, sustainable development, urban form, Sanandaj City

  References

[1] Habbibi, K. & Poorahmad, A., Analysis of Spatial Development of Sanandaj City by Geographic Information System, Vol. 1, Kurdistan University: Iran, 2005.

[2] Mashhadizadeh, v., An Analysis of Urban Planning Characteristics in Iran, Iran University of Science & Technology: Iran, 1996.

[3] Charehjoo F. & Chin Siong, H., The need for smart growth concept for Iranian cities, presented at the 3rd International Conference on Engineering Science and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2010.

[4] Izadi, H., The trend of changing rural area to urban area in Iran, challenges and advantages, presented at the Iranian Urbanization Issues Conference, 2003.

[5] Saidnia, A., The structure of unsustainable metropolitan Tehran, presented at the Iranian Urbanization Issues Conference, 2003.

[6] Atash, F., New Towns and Future Urbanization in Iran. TWPR, 22, p. 48, 2000.

[7] Azizi, M.M., Density in Urban Planning, Principles and Criteria for Density Determination, University of Tehran: Iran, 2003.

[8] SCI, General Population and Housing Census Results: Statistical Center of Iran., 2008.

[9] Ehlers, E., Capitalism and Urban Genesis in The Islamic East ( The Case of Iran), Translate by Abbas Saidi. : Tehran, Monshi, 2001.

[10] Galster, G., Hanson, R., Ratcliffe, M.R., Wolman, H., Coleman, S. & Freihage, J., Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate, 12, pp. 681–717, 2001. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2001.9521426

[11] Ewing, R., Is Los Angeles-Style sprawl  desirable.  American  Planning  Association,  63,  pp. 107–126, 1997. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944369708975728

[12] Burchell, R.W., Shad, N.A., Listokin, A. & Philips, H., The Costs of Sprawl Revisited. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1998.

[13] Neuman, M. The compact city fallacy. Planning Education and Research, 25, pp. 11–26, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04270466

[14] Burton, E. The Potential of the Compact City for Promoting Social Equity. Ur: Williams, K., Burton, E. & Jenks, M. (eds.). E& FN Spon: New York, 2000.

[15] Jenks, M., Burton, E. & Williams, K., The Compact City. E& FN Spon: New York, 1996.

[16] Huang, J., Lu, X.X. & Sellers, J.M. A global comparative analysis of urban form: Applying spatial metrics and remote sensing. Landscape and urban planning, 82, pp. 184–197, 2007. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.010

[17] Tsai, Y. Quantifying urban form: Compactness versus ‘sprawl’. Urban Studies, 42, pp. 141–161, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000309748

[18] Ewing, R., Pendall, R. & Chen, D., Measuring Sprawl and Its Impact, Smart Growth America: USA, 2002.

[19] Rahnama, M.R. & Abaszadeh, G., A Comparative study and analyzing compactness/ sprawl ratio in the metropolitan cities of Mashhad and Sydney. Geography and Regional Development, 6, pp. 101–128, 2006.

[20] Thomas, R.W., Information Statistics in Geography, Norwich: W. H Hutchins & Sons, 1981.

[21] Anselin, L., Space Stat Version 1.80: Users’ Guide, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University: Morgantown, WV, USA, 1995.

[22] Rahnama M.R. & Abaszadeh, G., Principles and Models for Measuring Physical Form of Cities, Mashhad University: Iran, 2008.

[23] Malek hoseini, A., Analyzing the spatial organization of the Markazi Province. Amayesh, 1, p. 1, 2006.

[24] Hekmatnia H. & Moosavi, M., The Application of Model in Geography, Focusing on Urban and Regional Planning. Elm e Navin e Yazd Publication: Yazd 2006.

[25] Habib, F. To explore the meaning of urban form. Honar-ha-ye Ziba, 25, p. 32, 2006.