OPEN ACCESS
The concept of sustainable development is of increasing importance for societies. Corporations are as relevant societal actors in an essential role for the realization and implementation of sustainable development. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the performance of corporations in the light of sustainable development. In this paper, basic methods and instruments for the assessment of corporate sustainability performance are compared. Sustainability assessments can be divided into two groups: The first group consists of methods based on monetary units; the second group consists of methods based on non-monetary units. The methods of Sustainable Value Added, Composite Sustainable Development Index and Integrated Sustainability Assessment are discussed in detail and evaluated regarding the criteria applicability, contribution to basic goals of sustainable development and completeness. The methods are used to assess the sustainability performance of BP and Royal Dutch/Shell Group.
assessment, Composite Sustainable Development Index, corporate sustainability assessment, Integrated Sustainability Assessment, monetarization, sustainable business management, sustainable development, Sustainable Value Added.
[1] World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1987.
[2] Robèrt, K.-H., Schmidt-Bleck, B., Aloisi de Laderel, J., et al., Strategic sustainable development – selection, design and synergies of applied tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(3), pp. 197–214, 2002.
[3] James, P., Towards sustainable business? Sustainable Solutions: Developing Products and Services for the Future, eds M. Charter & U. Tischner, Greenleaf Publishing: Sheffi eld, 2001.
[4] Spangenberg, J.H., Sustainable development: from catchwork to benchmarks and operational concepts. Sustainable Solutions: Developing Products and Services for the Future, eds M. Charter & U. Tischner, Greenleaf Publishing: Sheffi eld, 2001.
[5] Deloitte & Touch/ISSD, Business Strategy for Sustainable Development: Leadership and Accountability for the ’90s, IISD: Winnipeg, Canada, 1992.
[6] Roome, N.J. (ed.), Sustainable development and the industrial fi rm. Sustainable Strategies for Industry: The Future of Corporate Practice, Island Press: Washington, DC, 1998.
[7] Bennet, M., & James, P., Environment-Related Performance Measurement: Current Practice and Trends, Ashridge Management College: Ashridge, 1997.
[8] Krotschek, C., Prozeßbewertung in der nachhaltigen Wirtschaft (Process Assessment in a Sustainable Economy), Technical University, Graz, 1995.
[9] Narodoslawsky, M., & Krotschek, C., The Sustainable Process Index – a new dimension in ecological evaluation. Ecological Engineering, 6(4), pp. 241–258, 1996.
[10] Common, M. & Stagl, S., Ecological Economics, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2005.
[11] Figge, F. & Hahn, T., Sustainable Value Added – measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-effi ciency. Ecological Economics, 48(2), pp. 173–187, 2004.
[12] Lehni, M., Eco-effi ciency Indicators: A Tool for Better Decision-Making, World Business Council For Sustainable Development (WBCSD): Geneva, 1999.
[13] Figge, F. & Hahn, T., The cost of sustainability capital and the creation of sustainable value by companies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), pp. 47–58, 2005.
[14] Neumayer, E., Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms, Vol. 2, Edward Elgar: Massachusetts, 2003.
[15] ADVANCE, Sustainable Value of European Industry: A Value-Based Analysis of the Environmental Performance of European Manufacturing Companies (full version), The Advance Project, available at: www.advance-project.org, 2006.
[16] Figge, F. & Hahn, T., Sustainable value in the minerals industry. Sustainable Development Indicators in the Minerals Industry, Vol. 1, ed. P.N. Martens, Aachen International Mining Symposia ed., Glückauf: Essen, 2005.
[17] Hahn, T., Liesen, A., Figge, F. & Barkemeyer, R., Nachhaltig erfolgreich Wirtschaften: Eine Untersuchung der Nachhaltigkeitsleistung deutscher Unternehmen mit dem Sustainable-Value-Ansatz – Langversion (Sustainably Successful? Analysing, Measuring and Managing Corporate Sustainability with the Sustainable Value Approach), available at: www.new-projekt.de, 2007.
[18] Krajnc, D. & Glavic, P., A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 43, pp. 189–208, 2005.
[19] Krajnc, D. & Glavic, P., How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability. Ecological Economics, 55(4), pp. 551–563, 2005.
[20] Saaty, T.L., Analytical Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill: New York, 1980.
[21] Bechmann, A., Nutzwertanalyse, Bewertungstheorie und Planung, Paul Haupt: Bern, 1978.
[22] Baumgartner, R.J., Sustainability assessment. Einsatz der Fuzzy Logic zur integrierten ökologischen und ökonomischen Bewertung von Dienstleistungen, Produkten und Technologien, Techno-ökonomische Forschung und Praxis, eds U. Bauer, H. Biedermann & J.W. Wohinz, DUV: Wiesbaden, 2004.