Place, Relationships, and Community- Controlled Capital: On Ecosystem-Based Innovation Towards an Equitable Competitive Advantages Distribution, the Boston Ujima Project Case

Place, Relationships, and Community- Controlled Capital: On Ecosystem-Based Innovation Towards an Equitable Competitive Advantages Distribution, the Boston Ujima Project Case

C. Bevilacqua Y. Ou 

CludsLab PAU Department. Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy

12 December 2018
| Citation



The paper proposes that the issue related to an emerging inequality in advanced democracies due to the knowledge-based economy is partially argued in literature. Despite the political approaches traditionally grounded on the opposition of equality-oriented capitalism to efficiency-oriented capitalism, the shocks of technology produce results that tend to skew towards income and wealth polarization. The ongoing results of the new technologically driven economy reveal an increasing need for alternative ways to ensure an equitable distribution of the competitive advantages among the whole population. To strive against this polarization, the authors illustrated an example of multi-sectoral community- based institution, which can collaborate to construct economic democracy by empowering the civil society with the decision-making power in the economic sphere. The study stands out from the existing empirical studies by taking the Boston ujima Project (BuP) as an analytical framework with the aim of looking at the extent to which a place-based and multi-stakeholder innovation ecosystem promotes economic democratization and helps to address socioeconomic inequality. The paper defines an analytical tool based on a comparison of literature review and the organizational structure of BuP. The literature review allows to look into the economic impact of social innovation, focusing on the eco- nomic democratization process and ‘system thinking’ embedded in social innovation. Then, the BuP grounded in the systematization of literature review is described as an innovation ecosystem based on the multi-stakeholder collaborative mechanism, a novel ecosystem-based innovation approach to address socioeconomic inequality. It is found that by incorporating ‘ecosystem’ into social innovation process, the BuP has created a holistic, integrated approach that joins place, capital and relationships to address socioeconomic inequality.


Boston Ujima Project, economic democratization, ecosystem-based innovation, innovation, socioeconomic inequality


[1] Hübner, K., Space of innovation: Introductory remarks on the comparative analysis of the new economy. In The New Economy in Transatlantic Perspective, ed. K. Hübner, Routledge: London and New York, pp. 3–19, 2005.

[2] Cozzens, S., Innovation and Inequality: A View from the South. Brookings Institution, 2016. Available at (accessed 19 December, 2017).

[3] Chakravorty, S., Fragments of Inequality: Social, Spatial and Evolutionary Analyses of Income Distribution, Routledge: New York and London, 2014.

[4] Madeley, J., A People’s World: Alternatives to Economic Globalization, Zed Books: New York and London, 2003.

[5] Speth, J.G., American passage: Towards a new economy and a new politics. Ecological Economics, 84, pp. 181–186, 2012.

[6] Panayotakis, C., Remaking Scarcity: From Capitalist Inefficiency to Economic Democracy, Pluto Press: Chicago, 2011.

[7] Harvey, D., The Enigma of Capital and the Crises of Capitalism, Oxford University Press: New York, 2010.

[8] Henwood, D., After the New Economy, The New Press: New York, 2003.

[9] Bevilacqua, C., Pizzimenti, P. & Maione, C., S3: Cluster Policy & Spatial Planning: Knowledge Dynamics, Spatial Dimension and Entrepreneurial Discovery Process. Report, MAPS-LED Project, Horizon2020 MSCA RISE, 2017.

[10] Bartels, L.M., Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age, 2nd edn., Princeton University Press: Princeton, 2016.

[11] Savoia, A., Easaw, J. & Mckay, A., Inequality, democracy, and institutions: A critical review of recent research. World Development, 38(2), pp. 142–154, 2010. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.009

[12] Aghion, P., Caroli, E. & García-Peñalosa, C., The perspective of the new growth theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, pp. 1615–1660, 1999.

[13] Castelló-Climent, A., Inequality and growth in advanced economies: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(3), pp. 293–321, 2010. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10888-010-9133-4

[14] Cingano, F., Trends in income inequality and its impact on economic growth. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2014.

[15] Delbianco, F., Dabús, C. & Caraballo, M.A., Income inequality and economic growth: new evidence from Latin America. Cuadernos de Economía, 33(63), pp. 381–398, 2014.

[16] Fawaz, F., Rahnama, M. & Valcarcel, V.J., A refinement of the relationship between economic growth and income inequality. Applied Economics, 46(27), pp. 3351–3361, 2014.

[17] Persson, T. & Tabellini, G., Is inequality harmful for growth? The American Economic Review, 84(3), pp. 600–621, 1994.

[18] Schweickart, D., Economic democracy: A worthy socialism that would really work. Science and Society, 56(1), pp. 9–38, 1992.

[19] Wolff, N.E., The asset price meltdown and the wealth of the middle class. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, 2012. doi:10.3386/w18559

[20] Hahnel, R., Economic Justice and Democracy: From Competition to Cooperation, Routledge: New York, 2005.

[21] Archer, R., Economic Democracy: The Politics of Feasible Socialism, Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1995.

[22] Johanisova, N. & Wolf, S., Economic democracy: A path for the future? Futures, 44(6), pp. 562–570, 2012.

[23] Alperovitz, G., Speth, J.G. & Guinan, J., The Next System Project: New Political-Economic Possibilities for the 21st Century, 2015. Retrieved from https://thenextsystem. org/sites/default/files/2017-08/NSPReport1_Digital.pdf (16/12)

[24] Porter, M.E., The competitive advantage of the inner city. Harvard Business Review, pp. 55–71, 1995.

[25] Nobbs, C.L., Economics, Sustainability, and Democracy: Economics in the Era of Climate Change, Routledge: Abingdon, Oxon, New York, 2013.

[26] Cabrita, M.R., Cabrita, C., Matos, F. & del Pilar Muñoz Dueñas, M., ­Entrepreneurship capital and regional development: A perspective based on intellectual capital. In Entrepreneurship, Human Capital, and Regional Development: Labor Networks, Knowledge Flows, and Industry Growth, eds. R. Baptista & J. Leitão, Springer Switzerland: Cham, pp. 15–28, 2015.

[27] Harrisson, D., Bourque, R. & Széll, G., Social innovation, economic development, employment and democracy. In Social Innovation, the Social Economy and World Economic Development, eds. D. Harrisson, R. Bourque & G. Széll, Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Main, New York, pp. 7–16, 2009.

[28] Esteva, G., Development. In The Development Dictionary, A Guide to Knowledge as Power, ed. W. Sachs, Zed Books Ltd.: London and New York, pp. 6–25, 1992.

[29] Malleson, T., Economic democracy: The left’s big idea for the twenty-first century? New Political Science, 35(1), pp. 84–108, 2013.

[30] Kania, J. & Kramer, M., Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Leland Stanford Jr. University, 2011.

[31] Kim, K.S., Income distribution and poverty: An interregional comparison. World Development, 25(11), pp. 1909–1924, 1997.

[32] Beramendi, P., Häusermann, S., Kitschelt, H. & Kriesi, H. (eds)., The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, Cambridge University Press: New York, 2015.

[33] Venn, C., Neoliberal political economy, biopolitics and colonialism: A transcolonial genealogy of inequality. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), pp. 206–233, 2009. https://

[34] Schweickart, D., After Capitalism, 2nd edn., Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: Lanham, 2011.

[35] Ghista, D.N., Socio-Economic Democracy and the World Government: Collective Capitalism, Depovertization, Human Rights, Template for Sustainable Peace, World Scientific Publishing: Singapore, 2014.

[36] Raco, M., Competition, collaboration and the new industrial districts: Examining the institutional turn in local economic development. Urban Studies, 36(5–6), pp. 951–968, 1999.

[37] Widestrom, A., Displacing Democracy: Economic Segregation in America, University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia, 2015.

[38] Chuang, M.-Y., Chen, C.-J. & Lin, M.-J., The impact of social capital on competitive advantage: The mediating effects of collective learning and absorptive capacity. Management Decision, 54(6), pp. 1443–1463, 2016.

[39] Hana, U., Competitive advantage achievement through innovation and knowledge. Journal of Competitiveness, 5(1), pp. 82–96, 2013.

[40] MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A. & Chapman, K., Learning, innovation and regional development: a critical appraisal of recent debates. Progress in Human Geography, 26(3), pp. 293–311, 2002.

[41] Baltazar Herrera, M.E., Creating competitive advantage by institutionalizing corporate social innovation. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), pp. 1468–1474, 2015. https://

[42] Betcherman, G., McMullen, K. & Davidman, K., Training for the New Economy: A Synthesis Report, Canadian Policy Research Networks: Ottawa, 1998.

[43] Kelly, K., New Rules for the New Economy: 10 Radical Strategies for a Connected World, Penguin Books: New York, 1999.

[44] Cortright, J., New growth theory, technology and learning: A practitioners guide. Reviews of Economic Development Literature and Practice, 4, pp. 1–35, 2001.

[45] Foray, D. & Lundvall, B., The knowledge-based economy: from the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. In Employment and Growth in the KnowledgeBased Economy, ed. OECD, OECD Documents: Paris, pp. 11–34, 1996.

[46] Hidalgo, A. & Albors, J., Innovation management techniques and tools: A review from theory and practice. R&D Management, 38(2), pp. 113–127, 2008. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00503.x

[47] Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J.W. & Fleming, L., Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy, 35(7), pp. 994–1017, 2006.

[48] Arnstein, S.R., A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), pp. 216–224, 1969.

[49] Fagerberg, J. & Verspagen, B., Technology-gaps, innovation-diffusion and transformation: An evolutionary interpretation. Research Policy, 31(8–9), pp. 1291–1304, 2002.

[50] Röger, W., Structural changes and new economy in the EU and the US. In The New Economy and Economic Growth in Europe and the US, eds. D.B. Audretsch & P.J.J. Welfens, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg and New York, pp. 7–27, 2002.

[51] Takaki, L., Employee ownership+accountability=competitive advantage: Precor drives organizational change. Industrial and Commercial Training, 37(3), pp. 145–149, 2005.

[52] Royer, S., Waterhouse, J., Brown, K. & Festing, M., Employee voice and strategic competitive advantage in international modern public corporations – An economic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(4), pp. 234–246, 2008.

[53] Bannister, D.R., Making employee ownership a competitive advantage. Management Review, p. 46, 1995.

[54] Thompson, P., Mcwilliams, A. & Shanley, M., Creating competitive advantage: A ­stakeholder view of employee ownership. International Journal of Strategic Change Management, 5(3), pp. 262–278, 2014.

[55] Schumpeter, J.A., The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Transaction Publishers: New Jersey, NJ, 1934.

[56] Cooke, P. & Wills, D., Small firms, social capital and the enhancement of business performance through innovation programmes. Small Bus Eco, 13, pp. 219–234, 1999.

[57] McElroy, M.W., Second generation knowledge management, 2002. Retrieved from

[58] Cooke, P., Introduction: Origins of the concept. In Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalised World, eds. H.J. Braczyk, P. Cooke & M. Heidenreich, UCL Press: London, pp. 2–27, 1998.

[59] Weaver, P., Jansen, L., van Grootveld, G., van Spiegel, E. & Vergragt, P., Sustainable Technology Development, Routledge: New York, 2017.

[60] Lavie, D., The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), pp. 638–658, 2006. https://

[61] Kitschelt, H., Lange, P., Marks, G. & Stephens, J.D. (eds), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, Cambridge University Press: New York, 1999.

[62] Allard, S.W., Place, race, and access to the safety net. In The Colors of Poverty: Why Racial and Ethnic Disparities Persist, eds. A.C. Lin & D.R. Harris, Russell Sage Foundation: New York, pp. 232–260, 2008.

[63] Johnson, O.C.A., Inclusion, exclusion, and the “new” economic inequality. Texas Law Review, 94, pp. 1647–1665, 2016.

[64] Sharkey, P., The intergenerational transmission of context. American Journal of Sociology, 113(4), pp. 931–969, 2008.

[65] Barca, F., McCann, P. & Rodríguez-Pose, A., The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), pp. 134–152, 2012.

[66] Bynner, C., Rationales for Place-Based Approaches in Scotland. What Works Scotland, 2016. Available at (16 December, 2017).

[67] Pinoncely, V., Poverty, Place and Inequality: Why Place-Based Approaches Are Key to Tackling Poverty and Inequality, Royal Town Planning Institute: London, 2016.

[68] Tomaney, J., Place-Based Approaches to Regional Development: Global Trends and Australian Implications, Australian Business Foundation Limited: Sydney, 2010.

[69] Reed, R., Storrud-Barnes, S. & Jessup, L., How open innovation affects the drivers of competitive advantage: Trading the benefits of IP creation and ownership for free invention. Management Decision, 50(1), pp. 58–73, 2012. https://doi. org/10.1108/00251741211194877

[70] Chesbrough, H., Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, eds. H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke & J. West, Oxford University Press: New York, pp. 1–12, 2006.

[71] Loh, P. & Jimenez, S., Solidarity Rising in Massachusetts: How Solidarity Economy Movement Is Emerging in Lower-Income Communities of Color, Solidarity Economy Initiative: Cambridge, 2017.

[72] Edvinson, L. & Malone, M., Intellectual Capital, Harper Business: New York, 1997.

[73] Dahl, R.A., A Preface to Economic Democracy, University of California Press: Berkeley, 1985.

[74] Ganz, M., Public narrative, collective action, and power. In Accountability through Public Opinion: From Inertia to Public Action, eds. S. Odugbemi & T. Lee, The World Bank: Washington, D.C, pp. 273–289, 2011.

[75] Porter, M.E. & Kramer, M.R., Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, pp. 80–92, 2006.

[76] McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D.S., Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37(5), pp. 1480–1495, 2011.

[77] Barber, B.R., If Mayors Ruled the World: Dysfunctional Nations, Rising Cities, Yale University Press: New Haven and London, 2013.

[78] Marquetti, A., Schonerwald da Silva, C.E. & Campbell, A., Participatory economic democracy in action: Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre, 1989–2004. Review of Radical Political Economics, 44(1), pp. 62–81.

[79] Bevilacqua, C., Politiche di Sviluppo e Pianificazione Territoriale: Tra Innovazione e Prassi Ordinaria, Gangemi Editore. (in Italian): Roma, 2001.