The Implementation of Urban Sustainability Strategies: Theoretical and Methodological Implications for Researching Behaviour Change

The Implementation of Urban Sustainability Strategies: Theoretical and Methodological Implications for Researching Behaviour Change

D. MÜLLER-EIE L. BJØRNØ 

Department of industrial economics, risk management and planning, University of Stavanger, Norway

Page: 
894-907
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N5-894-907
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Implementing urban sustainability strategies has proven to be difficult. This paper aims at developing a holistic understanding of the urban sustainability concept with the help of a conceptual model, as well as offering a framework for understanding and researching the implementation of urban sustainability strategies. Here, individual behaviour change is understood as one of the main objectives of such strate-gies.

Through a conceptual model, four types of opposing and sometimes contradictory relationships are identified: (1) between global aims and local implementation, (2) between institutional pressure and the behaviour of individuals, (3) between strategic measures and personal consequences and (4) between attitudes and behaviour. These relationships are discussed in order to illustrate stalling factors in urban sustainability implementation.

Looking at behaviour change as a major goal of urban sustainability implementation, several social and individual behavioural theories are reviewed in order to construct a holistic and a compound model of the dynamics of behavioural change. By revealing a dual implementation process, consisting of provision on one side and choice on the other, we demarcate several important aspects for realising and researching urban sustainability strategies and their effectiveness. A more holistic way of assessing and monitoring the implementation of urban sustainability strategies is also proposed. The paper argues that rather than looking at the changes in the urban population’s behaviour as a result, we must view them as an internal and essential sub-concept of urban sustainability.

Keywords: 

adoption, behaviour change, diffusion of innovations, individual and collective behaviour, public travel, urban sustainability.

  References

[1] Müller-Eie, D. & Bjørnø, L., Urban sustainability as social innovation. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 191, WIT Press, 2015, ISSN 1743-3541.

[2] Müller-Eie, D. & Bjørnø, L., Urban sustainability and individual behavior. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 168, WIT Press, 2015, ISSN 1743-3509.

[3] Redclift, M., Sustainable development (1987–2005): an oxymoron comes of age.

Sustainable Development, 13(4), pp. 212–227, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.281

[4] Anable, J., Lane, B. & Kelay, T., An Evidence Base Review of Public Attitudes to Climate Change and Transport Behaviour, The Department for Transport, 2006.

[5] Williams, K., Does intensifying cities make them more sustainable? In Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, eds K. Williams, E. Burton & M. Jenks, E & FN Spon: London, 2000.

[6] Welbank, M., The search for a sustainable urban form. In The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? eds M. Jenks, E. Burton & K. Williams, E & FN Spon: London, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203362372_the_search_for_a_sustainable_urban

[7] Breheny, M., The compact city and transport energy consumption. Transaction Institute of British Geographers, 20, pp. 81–101, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/622726

[8] Hillman, M., In favour of the compact city. In The Compact City - A Sustainable Urban Form? eds M. Jenks, E. Burton & K. Williams, E & FN Spon: London, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203362372_in_favour_of_the_compact_city

[9] Davidson, S., Up-scaling social behaviour change programmes: the case of ecoteams. In Engaging the Public with Climate Change: Behaviour Change and Communication, eds L. Whitmarsh, S. O’Neill & I. Lorenzoni, Earthscan: London, 2011.

[10] Weber, C. & Perrels, A., Modelling lifestyle effects on energy demand and related emis-sions. Energy Policy, 28, pp. 549–566, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00040-9

[11] Ben-Akiva, M. & Bierlaire, M., Discrete choice methods and their applications to short term travel decisions. In Handbook of Transportation Science, Springer, pp. 5–33, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5203-1_2

[12] Barrett, G., The transport dimension. In The Compact City: a Sustainable Urban Form? eds M. Jenks, E. Burton & K. Williams, E & FN Spon: London, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203362372_the_transport_dimension

[13] Schelling, T.C., Micromotives and Macrobehavior, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1978.

[14] Lane, B. & Potter, S., The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: exploring the consum-er attitude–action gap. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11–12), pp. 1085–1092, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.026

[15] Næss, P., Can urban development be made environmentally sound? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 36(3), pp. 309–333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640569308711949

[16] Owens, S. & Drifill, L., How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of en-ergy. Energy Policy, 36, pp. 4415–4418, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.031

[17] Hertwich, E.G., Life cycle approaches to sustainable consumption – a critical review. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(13), pp. 4673–4684, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0497375

[18] Knight, C., Economic and social issues. In the Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? eds M. Jenks, E. Burton & K. Williams, E & FN Spon: London, 1996.

[19] Ornetzeder, M., Hertwich, E.G., Hubacek, K., Korytarova, K. & Haas, W., The envi-ronmental effect of car-free housing: A case in Vienna. Ecological Economics, 65, pp. 516–530, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.022

[20] Williams, K., Dair, C. & Lindsay, M., Neighbourhood design and sustainable lifestyles. In Dimensions of the Sustainable City, eds M. Jenks & C. Jones, Springer: Dordrecht, 2010.

[21] Müller-Eie, D., Urban environmental performance and individual behaviour: a com-parison between freiburg and stavanger. In Glasgow School of Art: Mackintosh School of Architecture, University of Glasgow: Glasgow, 2012.

[22] Bourdieu, P., The forms of capital.(1986). Cultural Theory: An Anthology, pp. 81–93, 2011.

[23] Rogers, E.M., Diffusion and Innovation, 5 edn., New York: Free Press, 2003.

[24] Triandis, H.C., Interpersonal Behavior, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company Monterey, CA, 1977.

[25] Lindenberg, S. & Steg, L., Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environ-mental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), pp. 117–137, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x

[26] Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S. & Kinnear, N., The role of instrumental, he-donic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, pp. 39–49, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004

[27] Steg, L., Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car

use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2–3), pp. 147–162, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.07.001

[28] Schwartz, S.H., Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, pp. 221–279, 1977. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5

[29] Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Abel, T.D., Guagnano, G.A. & Kalof, L., A value-belief-norm the-ory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), pp. 81–98, 1999.

[30] Gauzin-Müller, D., Sustainable Architecture and Urbanism – Concepts, Technologies, Examples, Basel: Birkhäuser, 2002.

[31] Brannigan, F., Dismantling the consumption-happiness myth: A neuropsychologi-cal perspective on the mechanisms that lock us in to unsustainable consumption. In Engaging the Public with Climate Change: Behaviour Change and Communication, eds L. Whitmarsh, S. O’Neill & I. Lorenzoni, Earthscan: London, 2011.

[32] Whitmarsh, L., O’Neill, S. & Lorenzoni, I. (eds), Engaging the Public with Climate Change: Behaviour Change and Communication, Earthscan: London, 2014.

[33] Huijts, N.M.A., Molin, E.J.E. & Steg, L., Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), pp. 525–531, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018

[34] Schwanen, T., Banister, D. & Anable, J., Rethinking habits and their role in behav-iour change: the case of low-carbon mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, pp. 522–532, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.06.003

[35] Verplanken, B., Old habits and new routes to sustainable behaviour. In Engaging the Public with Climate Change: Behaviour Change and Communication, eds L. Whitmarsh, S. O’Neill & I. Lorenzoni, Earthscan: London, 2011.

[36] Burgess, J., Harrison, C.M. & Filius, P., Environmental Communication and the Cultural Politics of Environmental Citizenship, 1998.

[37] Ajzen, I., The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), pp. 179–211, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

[38] Anable, J. & Gatersleben, B., All work and no play? The role of instrumental and af-fective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2–3), pp. 163–181, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.09.008

[39] Jenks, M. & Dempsey, N. (eds), Future Forms and Design for Sustainable Cities, Elsevier: Amsterdam, XIII, 2005.

[40] Keirstead, J. & Leach, M., Bridging the gaps between theory and practice: a service niche approach to urban sustainability indicators. Sustainable Development, 16, pp. 329–340, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.349

[41] Brohmann, B., Fritsche, U., Hartard, S., Schmied, M., Schmitt, B., Schünfelder, C., Schütt, N., Roos, W., Stahl, H., Timpe, C. & Wiegmann, K., Nachhaltige Stadtteile auf innerstädtischen Konversionsflächen: Stoffstromanalyse als Bewertungsinstrument, Öko-Institut: Darmstadt/Freiburg/Berlin, 2002.

[42] Tate, J., Void dwellings – a ‘headline’ indicator? Sustainable Development, 10, pp. 36–50, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.176

[43] Alberti, M., Measuring urban sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, pp. 381–424, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00083-2

[44] Adolphe, L., A design tool for global evaluation of urban sustainability. In PLEA - Environmentally Friendly, James & James Science Publishers: Lisbon, 1998.

[45] County Council, R., Bussvei 2020. 2014 20.03.2015], available at: http://www.rogfk.no/ Vaare-tjenester/Samferdsel/Bussvei-20202.

[46] County Council, R., Bypakke Nord-Jæren. 2014 20.03.2015]; available at: http://www. rogfk.no/Vaare-tjenester/Samferdsel/Bypakke-Nord-Jaeren.