Quality of Public Spaces and Sustainable Urban Development: Success and Failures in Fighting Social Exclusion

Quality of Public Spaces and Sustainable Urban Development: Success and Failures in Fighting Social Exclusion

C. Trillo

School of Built Environment, University of Salford, UK

1 May 2017
| Citation



Sustainable Urban Development embeds the three pillars of sustainability: environmental, social and economic. The European Commission position on Sustainable Urban Development reflects this concept, recommending an integrated approach paying attention to several intertwined factors, including the quality of public spaces. In European cities, poverty issues and exclusion are particularly acute. Inclusive growth is one of the main drivers of the Europe 2020 strategy, thus, it is expected that actions for fighting social exclusion are significant in deprived urban areas. However, in the EC approach still policies for social inclusion tend to remain relegated to the socio-economic sphere, with a weak link to the physical element as specific matter of concern. This paper aims at discussing the role played by the spatial quality of public spaces in supporting social integration, by focussing on a case study in Italy. More in details, the paper discusses the effects of public policies undertaken in the 1990s by the City of Reggio Calabria to reduce poverty for the Roma people, by displacing those inhabiting squalid and unhealthy camps to council housing in two neighbourhoods with a different quality of public spaces. In one area the displacement happened successfully, in the other, social issues plague the community. The paper aims at investigating the influence of the quality of public spaces on the displacement out- comes. The research methodology is mainly qualitative and is based on field work complemented by photo survey and interviews. The paper suggests that the spatial quality of the public spaces might have contributed to exacerbate social conflict and detachment in the unsuccessful case. It is therefore recommended to incorporate a significant component on the public space inclusive design in any socio- economic intervention aimed at overcoming social exclusion.


quality of public spaces, social exclusion, sustainable urban development

1. Social Exclusion, Sustainable Urban Development and Public Spaces
2. Fighting Exclusion: What Role for Public Spaces?
3. Investigating the Role Played by Public Spaces in Supporting Integration
4. Conclusions and Recommendations

[1] EC (European Commission). Europe 2020 Strategy. [online], available at: http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm [Retrieved March 2016].

[2] EC (European Commission). Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. European platform against poverty and social exclusion, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main. jsp?catId=961 [Retrieved March 2016].

[3] EC (European Commission) Leipzig Charted on Sustainable European Cities. Final Draft 2 May 2007, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/themes/urban/ leipzig_charter.pdf. [Retrieved March 2016].

[4] RFSC, Reference Framework for European Sustainable Cities, www.rfsc.eu [Retrieved March 2016].

[5] EC (European Commission). Urban Community Initiative 1994 1999. http://ec.europa.eu/ regional_policy/archive/urban2/urban/initiative/src/frame1.htm [Retrieved March 2016].

[6] EC (European Commission). Urban II: Cities & programmes. http://ec.europa.eu/ regional_policy/archive/urban2/towns_prog_en.htm [Retrieved March 2016].

[7] Colantonio, A. & Dixon, T., Measuring Socially Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Europe, Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development (OISD), 2009.

[8] Tallon, A., Urban Regeneration in the UK, 2nd edn., Routledge: London, 2013.

[9] Jones, P. & Evans, J., Urban Regeneration in the UK: Boom, Bust and Recovery, 2nd edn., Sage: London, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473915015

[10] EC (European Commission) Directorate General for Regional Policy. Cities of Tomorrow. Challenges, visions, ways forward; 2011, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/citiesoftomorrow/citiesoftomorrow_final.pdf. [Retrieved March 2016]

[11] Carmona, M., De Magalhães, C. & Edwards, M., Stakeholder views on value and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 7(2), pp. 145–169, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1357480022000012212

[12] Jacobs, J., The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Random House: New York, 1961.

[13] Putnam, R.D., Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), pp. 65–78, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002

[14] Putnam, R.D., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon & Schuster: New York, 2000.

[15] Calthorpe, P., The Next American Metropolis. Ecology, Community, and the American Dream, Princeton Architectural Press: New York, 1995.

[16] Gehl, J., Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space, 5th edn., Arkitektens Forlag: Copenhagen, 2001.

[17] Gehl, J. and Svarre, B., How to Study Public Life, Island Press: Washington D.C, 2013.

[18] Madanipour, A., Public and Private Spaces of the City, Routledge: London, 2003.

[19] Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T. & Tiesdell, S., Public Places - Urban Spaces, 2nd edn., Architectural Press: Amsterdam, London, 2010.

[20] Dines, N. & Cattell, V., Public Space, Social Relations and Well-Being in East London, Policy Press: Bristol, 2006.

[21] Gaffikin, F., McEldowney, M. & Sterret, K., Creating shared public space in contested city: the role of urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 15(4), pp. 493–513, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502338

[22] Bollens, S., Intervening in politically turbulent cities: spaces, buildings, and boundaries. Journal of Urban Technology, 16(2), pp. 79–107, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10630730903278595

[23] Madanipour, A., Roles and challenges of urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 11(2), pp. 173–193, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13574800600644035

[24] Madanipour, A., Social exclusion and space. In The City Reader, eds. R.T. LeGates & F. Stout, Routledge: London, pp. 186–194, 2011.

[25] Bollens, S., Urban planning and intergroup conflict: confronting a fractured public interest. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(1), pp. 22–42, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944360208977189

[26] EC (European Commission) Integrated Territorial Investments; 2014, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/iti_en.pdf. [Retrieved March 2016].

[27] Cammarota, A. & Tarsia, T., Reggio Calabria e Messina: tra mediazioni e conflitti. In Politiche Possibili. Abitare le città con i Rom e con i Sinti, ed. T. Vitale, Carocci Editore: Roma, pp. 87–94, 2009.

[28] Cammarota, A., Petronio, A., Tarsia, A. & Marino, A.G., I Rom e l’abitare interculturale. Dai torrenti ai condomini, Franco Angeli: Milano, 2009.

[29] FRA (European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights) Housing conditions of Roma and Travelers in the European Union. Comparative Report, 2009, available at: fra.europa. eu [Retrieved March 2016]

[30] McGarry, A., The dilemma of the European Union’s Roma policy. Critical Social Policy, 32, pp. 126–36, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261018311425201

[31] Tremlett A. & McGarry, A., Challenges facing Researchers on Roma Minorities in contemporary Europe: Notes towards a Research Program. ECMI Working Paper #62, January 2013. available at: http://www.ecmi.de/uploads/tx_lfpubdb/Working_ Paper_62_Final.pdf. [Retrieved March 2016].

[32] Ecolandia. Il parco. [online], available at: http://www.parcoecolandia.it/ecosite/il-parco/ [Retrieved March 2016]