This article aims to investigate the impact of place-making on the social value attached to two recently developed public squares in London. Empire and Bermondsey developments were developed with the explicit intention to have a public open space that is available for its residents and the surrounding community. Place-making supports the concept of generating places that improve the relationship between users and space, by increasing a sense of place. In this respect, social value is an intangible benefit that can be captured from places that shape community attitude and might often cater to necessary activities but is essential to everyday functions. Based on an extensive review of the literature and empirical work, this article will explore the similarities and differences between these two squares to deliver a better understanding of the reasons behind the urban design as a place-making tool in generating social values attached to physical spaces. These two squares are comparable in size, physical setting and geographical and social context providing unique contexts for socio-spatial analysis. This study follows a case-study approach. For both case studies, there are 100 surveys and 33 semi-structured interviews in total conducted with participants at the squares. Also, many site observations for this study have been taken, in both cases, at different times of the day tracking human movement, activities, spatial qualities, social interactions and spatial interrelations. The data gathered facilitate explicit connections between the behavioural, perceptual and social dimensions. These relationships are essential to understanding the role of urban design in adding social value. This study demonstrates the complex nature of the generation of social value in urban spaces through place-making.
place-making, public space, social value, urban design
 Carmona, M., Tiesdell, S., Heath, T. & Oc, T., Public Places Urban Spaces, Oxford: Architectural Press, 2010.
 Aravot, I., Back to phenomenological placemaking. Journal of Urban Design, 7(2):201–212, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1357480022000012230
 Lynch, K., The Image of the City, Harvard U.P; Oxford U.P, 1960.
 Jacobs, J., The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Vintage Books, 1961.
 Gehl, J. & Matan, A., Two perspectives on public spaces. Building Research & Information, 37(1): pp. 106–109, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613210802519293
 Lombard, M., Constructing Ordinary Places: Place-Making in Urban Informal Settlements in Mexico, Progress in Planning, 94, pp. 1–53, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2013.05.003
 Dempsey, N. & Burton, M., Defining place-Keeping: The Long-Term Management of Public Spaces, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(1), pp. 11–20, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.09.005
 PPS, What is Placemaking? cited, 2015.
 Carmona, M., Re-theorising contemporary public space: a new narrative and a new normative. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, pp. 1–33, 2014.
 Punter, J., Urban Design and the British Urban Renaissance, Routledge, 2010.
 Force, U.T., Towards an Urban Renaissance, London E & FN Spon, 1999.
 Carmona, M., The Place-shaping Continuum: a Theory of Urban Design Process. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), pp. 2–36, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854695
 RIBA, Delivering the Vision, RIBA London Response to the Draft London Plan, RIBA Publication, pp. 1–14, 2014.
 GLA, The London Plan: Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London Consolidated with Alterations since 2004. Sustainable development, 39, p. 2, 2008.
 GLA, The London Plan: Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London Consolidated with Alterations since 2011, ed. G.L. Authority, Greater London Authority: London, 2015.
 Carmona, M. & Wunderlich, F.M., Capital Spaces: The Multiple Complex Public Spaces of a Global City, Taylor & Francis., 2013.
 Macmillan, S., The Value Handbook: Getting the Most from Your Buildings and Spaces, CABE: London, 2006.
 Cattell, N.D.V., Gesler, W. & Curtis, S., Public Spaces, Social Relations and Well-Being in East London, Joseph Rowntree Foundation: Bristol, 2006.
 Walmsley, D.J., Urban Living: The Individual in the City, Longman Scientific & Technical Essex, 1998.
 Montgomery, J., Making a city: urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), pp. 93–116, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418
 Carr, S., Francis, S, Rivlin, L. & Stone, A., Public Space, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
 Carmona, M. & Wunderlich, F.M., Capital Spaces, the Multiple Complex Public Spacesof a Global City, Routledge, 2012.
 Keddie, J., The Square and the Gardens: Experiences of Public Space in Gentrifying London, 2010.
 Stewart, D. Operation Hip: Igloo’s Bermondsey Square, [cited 2014 17/03/2014], 2009, available at http://www.building.co.uk/operation-hip-igloos-bermondseysquare/3141368.article
 Ragin, C.C., The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, University of California Press, 1989.
 Marshall, S., Tabard Square is a major mixed-use development by Rolfe Judd within walking distance of the City London, Architecture Today, 177, p. 18, 2007.
 Solnit, R. & Schwartzenberg, S., Hollow City: The Siege of San Francisco and the Crisis of American Urbanism, Verso, 2002.
 Schwab, A., Communities in Transition: Bermondsey, Future of London’s Communities in Transition, 2013.
 UK-Government, Living Places: Cleaner, Safer, Greener, ed. D.P. Minister, London, 2006.
 Lofland, L.H., The Public Realm: Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Territory, Transaction Publishers, 1998.