Assessment of Sustainable Neighbourhoods: From Standards to Cultural Practices

Assessment of Sustainable Neighbourhoods: From Standards to Cultural Practices

C. Doussard 

Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne University, Paris, France

Page: 
368-378
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N3-368-378
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The development of Neighbourhood Sustainability Assessment (NSA) tools has contributed to the planning and design of better urban environments. Some of these systems aim to be universal through the use of standards, while paradoxically contributing to the certification of projects in culturally diverse contexts. This practice, however, is inconsistent with the notion of sustainability that advocates for a planning and design process adapted to a specific location. Therefore, this study examines how some national NSA tools adapt or not to other countries’ cultures while using standards as a mean of evaluation. It provides an analysis of four NSA systems, the LEED-ND v2009 rating tool, the HQE-A label, the AQUA Bairro e loteamento label, and HKTS green architecture award, conceived by American, French, Brazilian and Vietnamese organisations, respectively. It examines through the survey and classification of evaluation parameters to which extent an assessment culture is sometime contradictory to the assessment of neighbourhoods developed in other cultural contexts. The study ultimately leads to the characterisation of distinct NSA tools cultural profiles. Finally, it discusses the factors (such as contextual adaptation, planning and design ideology, and green construction market growth) that drive the conception of NSA tool.

Keywords: 

assessment culture, eco-neighbourhood certification, standards, sustainable neighbourhood assessment system, urban sustainability

  References

[1] Komeily, A. & Srinivasan, R.S., A need for balanced approach toneighborhood sustainability assessments: a critical review and analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society, 18, pp. 32–43, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.05.004

[2] Brundtland, G.H., Report of the world commission on environment and development “Our common future”, United Nations, 1987.

[3] Jabareen,Y.R., Sustainable urban forms their typologies,models, and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1), pp. 38–52, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05285119

[4] Kyrkou, D., Taylor, M., Pelsmakers, S. & Karthaus, R., Urban sustainability assessment systems: how appropriate are global sustainability assessment systems. Preceeding Of the 27th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium, PLEA 2011.

[5] Bond, A.J., Morrison-Saunders, A. & Howitt, R., Sustainability Assessment: Pluralism, Practice and Progress, Routledge, 2012.

[6] Sharifi, A. & Murayama, A., A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, pp. 73–87, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.06.006

[7] Reith, A. & Orova. M., Do green neighbourhood ratings cover sustainability? Ecological Indicators, 48, pp. 660–672, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.005

[8] Wangel, J.,Wallhagen, M., Malmqvist, T. & Finnveden, G., Certification systems for sustainable neighbourhoods: what do they really certify? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 56, pp.200–213, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.10.003

[9] Oliveira, V. & Pinho, P., Evaluation in urban planning: advances and prospects. Journal of Planning Literature, 24(4), pp. 343–361, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0885412210364589

[10] Sharifi, A., From garden city to eco-urbanism: the quest for sustainable neighborhood development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 20, pp. 1–16, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.09.002

[11] Glasson, J., Therivel, R. & Chadwick, A., Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment, Routledge, 2013. 

[12] Sharifi, A., Sustainability at the Neighborhood Level: Assessment Tools and the Pursuit of Sustainability, Diss. Nagoya University, 2013.

[13] Berardi, U., Beyond sustainability assessment systems: upgrading topics by enlarging the scale of assessment. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 2(4), pp. 276–282, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.5390/SUSB.2011.2.4.276

[14] United States Green Building Council (USGBC), Directory: project, available at http://www.usgbc.org/projects

[15] ISO, Standards, available at http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards.htm

[16] Giulietti, A., Harley, R.M., De Queiroz, L.P., Wanderley, M.G.L. & Van Den Berg, C., Biodiversity and conservation of plants in Brazil. Conservation Biology,19(3), pp. 632–639, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00704.x

[17] Asafu-Adjaye, J., The relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth: time series evidence from asian developing countries. Energy Economics, 22(6), pp. 615–625, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(00)00050-5

[18] United States Green Building Council (USGBC), Directory: people, available at http://www.usgbc.org/people

[19] Buckley, B. & Logan, K.,World Green Building Trends 2016: Developing Markets Accelerate Global Green Growth, Dodge Data & Analytics: Bedford Massachusetts, 2016.