Changing climate conditions and depleting resources are becoming more important on the global agenda, the paradigm shifting to understand which means (resources) are necessary to generate future well-being. Unfortunately, the formal built environment remains the most polluting global industry and due to its conservative character seems difficult to change. Most undertaken efforts focus on improving characteristics of material, construction and processes in technology seeking the ability to solve all contemporary environmental problems. This article argues that in the informal rural African built environment examples of other attitudes towards the same goals can be found, providing many sustainable solutions that have a circular process and are based on local renewable materials. Rural communities perceived as a multitude of communities of practices, with a collective (sustainable) intelligence towards their built environment can provide a circular, sustainable, self-reliant and resilient model for the built environment. This article argues that in order to articulate sustainable ‘local’ solutions, the inhabitant’s self-reliance is of vital importance, therefore stating a need for a model to evaluate what affords the inhabitant’s self-reliance and how this model could be used as support for the ‘expert’ to evaluate the inhabitant’s capabilities towards their built environment. This article uses the rural locality as a case study with the intention for subsequent global (urban and rural) application.
affordances, capability approach, collective intelligence, community of practice, rural self-reliance, situated knowledge, sustainable development
 UNHCR, Handbook of Self-Reliance, Operational Publications, 2006.
 Cromley, E., Cultural embeddedness in vernacular architecture. Building Research & Information, 36(3), pp. 301–304, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613210801902995
 Smits, M., An architect’s investigation into the self-reliance of a Sub-Saharan African community, 2014, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286457181
 Nel, E. & Binns, T., Rural self-reliance strategies in South Africa: community initiatives and external support in the former black homelands. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, pp. 367–377, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00003-6
 Rapoport, A., Some further thoughts on culture and environment. International Journal of Architectural Research, 2(1), pp. 16–39, 2008.
 Chambers, R., Poverty and livelihoods: Whose reality counts? Environment and Urbanization, 7(1), pp. 173–204, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/095624789500700106
 Lélé, S.M., Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19(6), pp. 607–621, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P
 Oliver, P., Built to Meet Needs: Cultural Issues in Vernacular Architecture, Architectural Press: Oxford, 2006.
 Prinet, E.J., Rural self-reliance strategies in South Africa: community initiatives and external support in the former black homelands (Master’s thesis, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 2000), available at: https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/ collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0089327
 Idoma, K. & Muhammad, I., Self-reliance: key to sustainable rural development in Nigeria. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology, 3(6), pp. 585–592, 2013.
 Ashby, M.F., Materials and the Environment: Eco-Informed Material Choice, Butterworth-Heinemann: Waltham, USA, 2012.
 Li, W. & Ng, E., Built environment sustainability assessment of poor rural areas of southwest China. Conference Proceeding PLEA 2014, eds R. Rawal, S. Manu & S. Khadpekar, CEPT University Press: Ahmedabad, India, 2014.
 Grudens-Schuck, N., Allen, W., Hargrove, T.M. & Kilivington, M., Renovating dependency and self-reliance for participatory sustainable development. Agriculture and Human Values, 20, pp. 53–64, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022412623083
 Matunhu, J., A critique of modernization and dependency theories in Africa: Critical assessment. African Journal of History and Culture, 3(5), pp. 65–72, 2011.
 Fonchingong, C.C. & Fonjong, L.N., The concept of self-reliance in community development initiatives in the cameroon grassfields. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 12(2), pp. 196–219, 2003.
 Cole, R.J., Review: time and responsibility: extending the concept of the present. Building Research & Information, 28(4), pp. 291–295, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613210050073742
 Leimeister, J.M., Collective intelligence. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2(4), pp. 245–248, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12599-010-0114-8
 Allee, V., Knowledge networks and communities of practice. OD Practitioner, 32(4), pp. 1–15, 2000.
 Frost, A., The different types of knowledge, available at: http://www.knowledge-management-tools.net/different-types-of-knowledge.html#ixzz3tg0FGVP4
 Polanyi, M., Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USA, 1962.
 Nonaka, I., A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), pp. 14–37, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
 Collins, H.M., The structure of knowledge. Social research. An International Quarterly, 60(1), pp. 95–116, 1993.
 Cobb, P. & Bowers, J., Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), pp. 4–15, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028002004
 Smith, M.K., Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger and communities of practice. The encyclopedia of informal education, 2003, available at: www.infed.org/biblio/communities_of_ practice.htm
 Wenger, E., Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept, available at: http://wenger-trayner.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/09- 10-27-CoPs-and-systems-v2.01.pdf
 Wenger, E., Communities of Practice; Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge Press: Cambridge, 1999.
 Willer, H., Review: Foreign Aid, Self-Reliance, and Economic Development in West Africa, ed. R.O. Olaniyan, Praeger Publisher: Westport, 1996.
 Sen, A.K., Capability and well-being. The Quality of Life, eds M.C. Nussbaum & A.K. Sen, Clarendon Press: Oxford, pp. 30–53, 1993.
 Clark, D.A., The capability approach: its development, critiques and recent advances. Economics Series Working Papers GPRG-WPS-032, University of Oxford, Department of Economics: Oxford, 2005.
 Robeyns, I., The capability approach. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. E.N. Zalta, 2011, available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/capability-approach/
 Maier, J.R. & Fadel, G.M., Comparing function and affordance as bases for design. Proceedings of DECT’02, Montreal, Canada, 2002.
 Maier, J.R. & Fadel, G.M., Affordance based design methods for innovative design, redesign and reverse engineering. Research in Engineering Design, 20(4), pp. 225–239, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00163-009-0064-7
 Uzzell, D. & Clark, C., The affordances of the home, neighborhood, school, and town centre for adolescents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1–2), pp. 95–108, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0242
 Maier, J.R. & Fadel, G.M., An affordance-based approach to architectural theory, design, and practice. Design Studies, 30(4), pp. 393–414, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.01.002
 Maier, J.R. & Fadel, G.M., Affordance based design: a relational theory for design. Research in Engineering Design, 20(4), pp. 13–27, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00163-008-0060-3
 Maier, J.R., Ezhilan, T. & Fadel, G.M., The affordance structure matrix: a concept exploration and attention directing tool for affordance based design. Proceeding ASME Conference, pp. 277–287, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/DETC2007-34526