Assessment of the Adaptive Reuse of Castles as Museums: Case of Cyprus

Assessment of the Adaptive Reuse of Castles as Museums: Case of Cyprus

D. Misirlisoy K. Günçe 

Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Architecture, Cyprus

Page: 
147-159
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V11-N2-147-159
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Military establishments, including castles, fortresses, military posts and towers, were mainly constructed for defence purposes. The conservation of military structures as well as other heritage buildings is important since they are monuments that represent a sense of identity, and national pride, bearing a message of oppression. The only way to sustain these monuments is re-functioning with an appropriate approach since they have already lost their original function. However, the problem is to select the most appropriate function according to the structural and formal characteristics of the monuments.

The study aims to question the success of the adaptive reuse projects in terms of appropriateness of the museum function and its implementation in castles. Generally, there is a tendency to convert old castles into museums. Due to the physical characteristics, museum can be accepted as a compatible function, if museums are designed with correct approaches. Otherwise, the heritage buildings will lack a living function and become disused or abandoned. The study is a comparative research among castles located in Cyprus and converted to museums. Four castles of the castles in Cyprus that have been converted to museums have been evaluated and compared in terms of the use of military establishments as museums. The selected castles were evaluated in two parts with defined criteria: firstly, in terms of conservation principles and secondly, in terms of museography.

According to the results, generally the adaptive reuse projects have sustained the cultural identity of the heritage buildings; however, they have failed in bringing about efficient use and achieving socio-cultural benefits. Although structures have been preserved physically, most of them lack a living function and visitors. Existing exhibitions should be supported by other exhibitions or activities to attract more visitors. Also, successful museum design approaches around the world should be observed and analysed. Then, the existing museums should be re-designed.

Keywords: 

adaptive reuse, castle, conservation, cyprus, museography

  References

[1] Elsorady, D.A., Assessment of the compatibility of new uses for heritage buildings: The example of Alexandria National Museum, Alexandria, Egypt. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15, pp. 511–521, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.10.011

[2] Ames, D. & Wagner, R., Design and Historic Preservation: The Challenge of Compatibility, Rosemont Publishing: Maryland, 2009.

[3] Bullen, P.A. & Love, P.E.D., Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Structural Survey, 29(5), pp. 411–421, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02630801111182439

[4] Langston, C., Wong, F.K.W., Hui, E.C.M. & Shen, L.-Y., Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 43(10), pp. 1709–1718, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.017

[5] Latham, D., Creative Re-use of Buildings Volume II, Donhead Publishing: London, 2000.

[6] Petre, J.S., Crusader castles of Cyprus: The fortifications of Cyprus under the Lusignans:1191-1489, Phd Thesis, Cardiff University, UK, 2010.

[7] ICOMOS, Venice Charter, International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites, available at http://www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf, 1964 (accessed June 2014).

[8] Australia ICOMOS, Burra Charter, The Charter for Places of Cultural Significance [online], available at http://australia.icomos.org/wpcontent/uploads/BURRA_CHARTER.pdf, 1999 (accessed June 2012).

[9] The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, available at: http://www.nps.gov/hps/tps/standguide/rehab/rehab_standards.htm, 1979 (accessed June 2012).

[10] Macleod, S., Hanks, L.H. & Hale, J., Museum Making: Narratives, Architectures, Exhibitions, Routledge: London, 2012.

[11] Grewcock, D., Doing Museology Differently, Routledge: London, 2013.

[12] Vergo, P., New Museology, Reaktion: London, 1989.

[13] Günçe, K. & Mısırlısoy, D., Adaptive Reuse of Military Establishments as Museum: Conservation vs. Museography, Vol. 143, WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, WIT Press, 2014, ISSN 1743-3509.

[14] Sonyel, S.R., Cyprus: The Destruction of a Republic and its Aftermath, CYREP: Nicosia, 2003.

[15] Tofallis, K., A History of Cyprus, Greek Institute: London, 2002.

[16] Günçe, K., Ertürk, Z. & Ertürk, S., Questioning the ‘prototype dwellings’ in the framework of Cyprus traditional architecture. Building and Environment, 43(12), pp. 823–833, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.01.032

[17] Brooker, G. & Stone, S., Rereadings: Interior Architecture and the Design Principles of Remodelling Existing Buildings, RIBA Enterprises: London, 2004.

[18] Worthing, D. & Bond, S., Managing Built Heritage: The Role of Cultural Significance, Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470697856

[19] Mısırlısoy, D. & Günçe, K., An Analytical Approach for Evaluation of Contemporary Additions to Architectural Heritage, RE-Cond’15: Re-Evaluating Contemporary Designs in Historical Context, Istanbul, Turkey, 22–24 July 2015.