Stratigraphy and Analysis of Interfaces for the Preservation of Architectural Heritage

Stratigraphy and Analysis of Interfaces for the Preservation of Architectural Heritage

D.R.Fiorino

Department of Civil Environmental Engineering and Architecture (DICAAR), University of Cagliari, Italy

Page: 
755-766
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V10-N5-755-766
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
31 October 2015
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The study contributes to the recognition of the central role of the interface in a restoration project. In fact, boundaries, joints and connections represent the key factor for understanding and interpreting the chronological sequence of the construction in a historical monument and they are the place where the contact of differ- ent entities can engender problems of connection and transmission, as well as material, chemical–physical, aesthetic or related to technological compatibility (structural, thermic and hygrometric). In the planning stage, they also intervene decisively in the principles of feasibility such as distinctness, reversibility, current expres- sion and sustainability, which form the theoretical basis of the discipline. One particular case of interface is the one generated by erosion. The text presents the case of erosion of the urban walls of Cagliari, where the phenomenon has been faced by the creation of interesting integration interfaces in the course of time. Particularly, in the case of the ‘Porta di Altamira’, a scale of the degrees of erosion, useful for the planning of possible units of integration, has been studied. Based on the case study and the theoretical principles of the discipline, the research suggests the stratigraphic process as a standard methodology and operating criterion for the preserva- tion and the restoration of interfaces and for the integration of gaps.

Keywords: 

chronologies of structures, compatibility, distinctness, integration of lacks, restoration

  References

[1] Doglioni, F., Ruolo e salvaguardia delle evidenze stratigrafiche nel progetto e nel cantiere di restauro, Arqueologìa de la Arquitectura no. 1, Università dei Paesi Baschi, Vitoria-Gasteiz, pp. 113–130, 2002.

[2] Gilento, P., Parenti, R. & Vecchi, A., Archeologia dell’architettura e rischio sismico, Archeologia dell’Architettura, All’insegna del Giglio: Firenze, 2008.

[3] Fiorino, D.R., San Fruttuoso. Studi, restauri, allestimenti museali, Ggallery: Genova, 2012.

[4] Brogiolo, G.P. & Cagnana, A., Archeologia dell’architettura: metodi e interpretazioni, Archeologia dell’Architettura, All’Insegna del Giglio: Firenze, 2012.

[5] Quendolo, A., Permanenza e leggibilità dei dati materiali: alcune riflessioni sul ruolo della conoscenza stratigrafica per la conservazione del potenziale informativo del costruito, Archeologia dell’Architettura no. XI, All’insegna del Giglio, Firenze, pp. 1–8, 2006.

[6] Fiorino, D.R., La stratigrafia urbana, Proposte per Stampace. Idee per un piano di conservazione del quartiere storico cagliaritano, eds. Giannattasio, C. & Scarpellini,P., Gangemi: Roma, pp. 69–74, 2009.

[7] Pirinu, A., Il disegno dei baluardi cinquecenteschi nell’opera dei fratelli Paleari Fratino, All’Insegna del Giglio, Documenti di archeologia postmedievale: Firenze, 2013.

[8] Fiorino, D.R., Giannattasio, C., Grillo, S.M. & Vacca G., Conservation and valorization of historical building: the case-study of Stampace quarter in Cagliari (Sardinia, Italy), Proceedings of the 3th International Conference on Heritage and Sustainable Development, eds. R. Amoêda, S. Lira & C. Pinheiro, Green Lines Institute: Barcelos, vol. 3, pp. 1777–1786, 2012.

[9] Fiorino, D.R., Stratigraphic evidence in the ancient urban walls of Cagliari (Sardinia-Italy). WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 143, pp. 257–268, 2014. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/dshf140221

[10] Bellini, A., Che cos’è il restauro. Nove studiosi a confronto, ed. B.P.Torsello, Marsilio: Venezia, pp. 21–24, 2005.