Permeability and stability of soilbags in slope protection structures

Permeability and stability of soilbags in slope protection structures

Bo Zhou Hongyu Wang Xiaodong Wang Jinghui Ji 

College of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China

Yinchuan Energy Institute, Yinchuan 750105, China

Corresponding Author Email: 
zbzb.8160@163.com
Page: 
1094-1100
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.360341
Received: 
5 February 2018
| |
Accepted: 
29 May 2018
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Farmland drainage ditch slumps restrict recirculation of water resources in the irrigation area of Ningxia in China. To address this problem, soilbags are applied for farmland drainage ditch slope protection, because of their double efficacy in solid slope collapse prevention and water purification. Variations in the mean flow rate, weight of soil passing through the geotextile, and gradient ratio were analyzed based on filtration criteria. Filtration and permeability performance of soilbag technology was studied using a clogging and permeability test, which was performed with gradient ratio and penetration test instruments. Different hydraulic gradients and building structures were tested. The clogging test shows that a rapid increase in the hydraulic gradient can decrease the permeability coefficient of the soil-geotextiles system by 77.99%, lower filtration, reduce soil content per unit area, and increase leakage. The influence of the size of the soilbag (two different sizes were tested) and their arrangement was investigated. Penetration tests demonstrated that an overlapped structure with staggered joints significantly reduced the overall permeability coefficient. With a smaller bag size, the permeability coefficient of structure was larger. The permeability coefficient ratio with different bag arrangements was as high as 90.75%. The results indicate that flow through a soilbag structure is governed solely by the gaps between neighboring containers and that flow through the soil in the containers can be neglected. The arrangement of soilbags thus strongly affects the permeability of the structure. Combining these results with a masonry plan for slope protection in engineering applications with soilbags, the equivalent permeability coefficient of the soilbag slope protection increased 100% and seepage pressure decreased 50%, which effectively improved the stability of the slope protection. These results provide a theoretical basis for further engineering applications.

Keywords: 

soilbag,, filtration characteristic,  permeability coefficient, gradient ratio, seepage pressure

1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusion
Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the national natural science fund project (41462010); Ningxia college scientific research project (NGY2016244); Ningxia university graduate student innovation project funding (GIP201635).

  References

[1] Recio J, Oumeraci H. (2009). Peocesses affecting the hydraulic stability of coastal revetments made of geotextile sand containers. Coastal Engineering 56: 260-284. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2008.09.006

[2] Recio J, Oumeraci H. (2007). Effect of deformations on the hydraulic stability of coastal structures made of geotextile sand containers. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 25: 278-292. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem. 2007.02.006

[3] Koerner RM. (2000). Emerging and future developments of selected geosynthetic applications. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 126(4): 291-306. 

[4] Corbella S, Stretch DD. (2012). Geotextile sand filled containers as coastal defence: South African experience. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 35: 120-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.09.004

[5] Yasuhara K, Recio-Molina J. (2007). Geosynthetic-wrap around revetments for shore protection. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 25: 221-232. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.02.004

[6] Vahedifard F, Shahrokhabadi S, Leshchinsky D. (2016). Geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures with concave facing profile. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 44: 358-365. http://dx.dio.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.  2016.01.004

[7] Bai ZF, Li GL, Xiang LI, Zhang PX, Liu P, Gao X, Zhu SJ. (2014). Stability of terraced ridges using polypropylene geotextile bags. Journal of Northwest A&F Univcrsity (Nat. Sci. Ed) 42(4): 157-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2014.04.024.html

[8] Li GL, Gao X, Liu X. (2015). The main forms and stability of terraced walls build with polypropylene geotextile bags. Journal of China Agricultural University 20(2): 201-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2015.02.25

[9] Li GL, Liu LN, Zhang T. (2015). Benefits of terraced fields ridges built by polypropylene geotextile bags. Soil and Water Conservation in China 8: 70-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.14123/j.cnki.swcc.2015.0231

[10] Korkut R, Martinez EJ, Morales R, Ettema R, Barkdoll B. (2007). Geobag performance as scour counter measure for bridge abutments. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 13(4): 431-439. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:4(431)

[11] Akter A, Pender G, Wright G, Crapper M. (2013). Performance of a Geobag Revetment. I: Quasi-Physical Modeling. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 139(8): 865-876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000735

[12] Akter A, Pender G, Wright G, Crapper M. (2013). Performance of a geobag revetment II: numerical modeling. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 139(8): 877-885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000724.

[13] Li Z, Liu SH, Wang LJ. (2013). Experimental study of frost heave and thawing settlement of soilbags under different freeze-thaw cycles. Rock and Soil Mechanic 34(9): 2541-2545. http://10.16285/j.rsm.2013.09.018. 

[14] Zhang YY. (1988). Causes of slope failure of drainage ditches and its prevention. Journal of Hohai University 16(2): 70-76.

[15] Tang L, Tang XW, She W. (2013). Influence of uniaxial tensile strain on filtration characteristics of geotextiles. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 35(4): 785-788.

[16]  Chen L, Yi HQ, Xu Qi. (2006). The study of the structure stability simulated tests in soil-geotextile filtration system. Journal of Hydroelectric Ingineering 25(4): 117-121. 

[17] Shu YM. (2002). Application of needle-punched geotextile of silt as reversed filter. Shuili Xuebao 11: 95-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.13243/j.cnki.slxb.2002.11.017

[18] Hu LW. (2002). Experimental study on filter geotextiles applied in Shenzhen River project. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 24(3): 351-355.

[19] Shan HY, Wang WL, Chou TC, (2001). Effect of boundray conditions on the hydraulic behavior of geotextile filtration system. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 19(7): 509-527. 

[20] Recio J, Oumeraci H. (2008). Hydraulic permeability of structures made of geotextile sand containers: Laboratory tests and conceptual model. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 26(9): 473-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmen.2008.05.006.

[21] Liu SH, Bai FQ, Wang YS, Wang S. (2013). Treatment for txpansive soil channel slope with soilbags. Joureal of Aerosoace Engineering 26: 657-666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000198.

[22] Goncalves JC, Caetano Vasques N, Silva C, Paccola E, Schmidt Filho E, Ueda Yamaguchi N, Aparecida Andreazzi M, Gasparotto F. (2018). Influence of the application of filter cake on soil chemical characteristics. Chemical Engineering Transactions 65: 775-780. http://dx.doi.org/10.3303/CET1865130

[23] Fang K, Zhou H, Lu Z. (2018). Research on optimization of drill hole gas pre-drainage process in low permeability outburst coal seam. Chemical Engineering Transactions 66: 667-672. http://dx.doi.org/10.3303/CET1866112