An effective krill herd based optimal NN for parameter evaluation in Shell-And-Tube heat exchangers

An effective krill herd based optimal NN for parameter evaluation in Shell-And-Tube heat exchangers

Uttam RoyMrinmoy Majumder 

School of Hydro-informatics Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Agartala, Barjala, Jirania, Tripura 799046, India

Corresponding Author Email: 
uttam_ju31@yahoo.co.in
Page: 
663-671
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.360231
Received: 
1 September 2017
|
Accepted: 
14 May 2018
|
Published: 
30 June 2018
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Helical baffles are employed increasingly in shell-and-tube heat exchangers for their significant advantages in reducing pressure drop, vibration, and fouling while maintaining a higher heat transfer performance. In order to make good use of helical baffles, serial improvements have been made by many researchers. In this paper create model of optimal NN for prediction analysis in parameters compared to existing works. This hidden layer and neuron optimization process fish asked KHO technique used. For more verification, KHO is applied to six design problems reported in the literature. Further, the performance of the KH algorithm is compared with that of various algorithms representative of the state-of-the-art in the area. The results of different algorithms are breaking down and stood out from comparative systems, and the finest results rising out of them are discovered by standing out the results from least MSE values. From the results our proposed method achieves minimum MSE compared to existing works and maximum prediction accuracy in optimization model.

Keywords: 

heat transfer, optimization, fish, Neural Network, hidden layer and neuron, energy and efficiency

1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Proposed Methodology
4. Result and Discussion
5. Conclusion
  References

[1] Salahuddin U, Muhammad B, Haider E. (2015). A review of the advancements made in helical baffles used in shell and tube heat exchangers. Journal of International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 67: 104–108.

[2] Mohanraja M, Jayaraj S, Muraleedharan C. (2015). Applications of artificial neural networks for thermal analysis of heat exchangers-A review. Journal of Thermal Sciences 90: 150-172, 2015.

[3] Emani S, Yusoh NA, Gounder RM, Shaari KZK. (2017). Effect of operating conditions on crude oil fouling through CFD simulations. International Journal of Heat and Technology 35(4): 1034-1044. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.350440

[4] Turgut OE, Turgut MS, Coban MT. (2014). Design and economic investigation of shell and tube heat exchangers using improved intelligent tuned harmony search algorithm. Journal of Ain Shams Engineering 5(4): 1215-1231.

[5] Hadidi A, Nazari A. (2013). Design and economic optimization of shell-and-tube heat exchangers using biogeography-based (BBO) algorithm. Journal of Applied Thermal Engineering 51: 1263-1272.

[6] Walraven D, Laenen B, D’haeseleer W. (2014). Comparison of shell-and-tube with plate heat exchangers for the use in low-temperature organic Rankine cycles. Journal of Energy Conversion and Management 87: 227–237.

[7] Deethayat T, Asanakham A, Kiatsiriroat T. (2016). Performance analysis of low temperature organic Rankine cycle with zeotropic refrigerant by Figure of Merit (FOM). Journal of Energy 96: 96-102.

[8] Zhang SJ, Wang HX, Guo T. (2011). Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation. Journal of Applied Energy 88: 2740–2754.

[9] Liu Q, Duan YY, Yang Z. (2013). Performance analyses of geothermal organic Rankine cycles with selected hydrocarbon working fluids. Journal of Energy 63: 123-132.

[10] Dizaji HS, Jafarmadar S, Hashemian M. (2015). The effect offlow, thermodynamic and geometrical characteristics on energy loss in shell and coiled tube heat exchangers. Journal of Energy 91: 678-684.

[11] Yang J, Fan AW, Liu W, Jacobi AM. (2014). Optimization of shell-and-tube heat exchangers conforming to TEMA standards with designs motivated by constructal theory. Journal of Energy Conversion and Management 78: 468–476.

[12] Manente G, Da Lio L, Lazzaretto A. (2016). Influence of axial turbine efficiency maps on the performance of subcritical and supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle systems. Journal of Energy 107: 761-772.

[13] Ji JD, Ge PQ, Bi WB. (2016). Numerical analysis on shell-side flow-induced vibration and heat transfer characteristics of elastic tube bundle in heat exchanger. Journal of Applied Thermal Engineering 107: 544–551.

[14] Zhao SY, Chen Q. (2016). Design criteria of different heat exchangers for the optimal thermodynamic performance of regenerative refrigeration systems. Journal of Applied Thermal Engineering 93: 1164–1174.

[15] Solotych V, Lee D, Kim J, Amalfi RL, Thome JR. (2016). Boiling heat transfer and two-phase pressure drops within compact plate heat exchangers: Experiments and flow visualizations. Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 94: 239–253.

[16] Kang ZH, Zhu JL, Lu XL, Li TL, Wu XJ. (2015). Parametric optimization and performance analysis of zeotropic mixtures for an organic Rankine cycle driven by low-medium temperature geothermal fluids. Journal of Applied Thermal Engineering 89: 323-331.

[17] Habka M, Ajib S. (2014). Investigation of novel, hybrid, geothermal-energized cogeneration plants based on organic Rankine cycle. Journal of Energy 70: 212-222.

[18] Sahin AS, Kılıç B, Kılıç U. (2011). Design and economic optimization of shell and tube heat exchangers using Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithm. Journal of Energy Conversion and Management 52: 3356–3362.

[19] Alimoradi A, Veysi F. (2016). Prediction of heat transfer coefficients of shell and coiled tube heat exchangers using numerical method and experimental validation. Journal of Thermal Sciences 107: 196-208.

[20] Wen J, Yang HZ, Jian GP, Tong X, Li K, Wang SM. (2016). Energy and cost optimization of shell and tube heat exchanger with helical baffles using Kriging metamodel based on MOGA. Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 98: 29–39.

[21] Scattina A. (2016). Numerical analysis of tube expansion process for heat exchangers production. Journal of Mechanical Sciences 118: 268–282.

[22] Chagnon-Lessard N, Mathieu-Potvin F, Gosselin L. (2016). Geothermal power plants with maximized specific power output: Optimal working fluid and operating conditions of subcritical and transcritical Organic Rankine Cycles. Journal of Geothermics 64: 111–124.

[23] Gao B, Bi QC, Nie ZS, Wu JB. (2015). Experimental study of effects of baffle helix angle on shell-side performance of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with discontinuous helical baffles. Journal of Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 68: 48–57.

[24] Sun SC, Hong Q, Zhao FZ, Ruan LM, Li BX. (2016). Inverse geometry design of two-dimensional complex radiative enclosures using krill herd optimization algorithm. Journal of Applied Thermal Engineering 98: 1104–1115.

[25] Kamble LV, Pangavhane DR, Singh TP. (2015). Neural network optimization by comparing the performances of the training functions -Prediction of heat transfer from horizontal tube immersed in gas–solid fluidized bed. Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 83: 337-344.

[26] Amir G, Amir A. (2016). An introduction of Krill Herd algorithm for engineering optimization. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 22(3): 302-310.