Characteristic analysis of gas & solid phase flow in oil shale pyrolysis circulating fluidized bed

Characteristic analysis of gas & solid phase flow in oil shale pyrolysis circulating fluidized bed

Mingshu ChiQing Wang  Qing Wang  Qing Wang  Qi Liu 

School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China

Engineering research Center of Oil Shale Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Education, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, China

Corresponding Author Email: 
cms20062006@163.com
Page: 
159-164
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.360121
Received: 
2 September 2017
| |
Accepted: 
17 October 2017
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Emissions from common oil shale extraction equipment contain many small-size oil shale particles unprocessed. Pyrolyzing oil shale by using CFB (circulating fluidized bed) can solve this problem well. To investigate kinetic characteristics of oil shale particles in CFB, we studied the difference in fluidization characteristic of oil shale particles between various main-flow air intakes by simulating the fluidization process based on computational fluid mechanics of particles. It turned out that: when airflow pushes particles a spherical “bubble” zone forms, and when the bubble bursts the horizontal size is subtly affected by air intake; increasing air intake can accelerate oil shale particles fluidization and improve the cyclone separator outlet air velocity.

Keywords: 

gas & solid phase flow, oil shale, CFB, computational fluid mechanics of particles

1. Introduction
2. Numerical Methods
3. Computational Conditions
4. Result Analysis
5. Conclusions
  References

[1] Zhao X, Liu Z, Liu Q. (2017). The bond cleavage and radical coupling during pyrolysis of Huadian oil shale. Fuel 199: 169-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.02.095

[2] Jiang HB, Zhu ZP, Wang Y, Yu KS, Liu JP. (2014). Pyrolysis characteristics for oil extraction of pulverized Yaojie oil shale in bubble column reactor. Chemical Enginee Ring 42(10): 15-19. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-9954.2014.10.004

[3] Chang Z, Chu M, Zhang C, Bai S, Lin H, Ma LB. (2018). Influence of inherent mineral matrix on the product yield and characterization from Huadian oil shale pyrolysis. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis 130: 269-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2017.12.022

[4] Gagliano A, Nocera F, Patania F, Bruno M, Scirè S. (2016). Kinetic of the pyrolysis process of peach and apricot pits by TGA and DTGA analysis. International Journal of Heat and Technology 34(2): S553-S560. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.34Sp0250.

[5] Soone J, Doilov S. (2003). Sustainable utilization of oil shale resources and comparison of contemporary technologies used for oil shale processing. Oil Shale 20(3): 311-323.

[6] Potapov OP, Khaskhachikh VV, Gerasimov GY. (2017). State-of-the-art technologies of oil shale thermal processing. Journal of Physics Conference Series 891(1): 012236. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/891/1/012236

[7] Qin H, Yue YK, Liu HP, Wang Q. (2015). Current status and prospect of oil shale retorting technologies in China. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress 34(5): 1191-1198.

[8] Pan Y, Zhang X, Liu S, Yang S, Ren N. (2012). A review on technologies for oil shale surface retort. Journal- Chemical Society of Pakistan 34(6): 1331-1338.

[9] Gao M, Hong F, Liu J. (2017). Investigation on energy storage and quick load change control of subcritical circulating fluidized bed boiler units. Applied Energy 185(1): 463-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.140

[10] Lyu J, Yang H, Ling W, Nie L, Yue G, Wang SL. (2017). Development of a supercritical and an ultra-supercritical circulating fluidized bed boiler. Frontiers in Energy (4): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-017-0512-4

[11] Palkar RR, Shilapuram V. (2017). Artificial Neural Network Modeling of Hydrodynamics of Liquid-Solid Circulating Fluidized Beds. Chemical Engineering & Technology 40(1): 145-152.

[12] Guo QJ, Qi XN, Wei Z, Yang BB, Sun P. (2016). Experimental study on hydrodynamic performance and heat transfer mechanism of vapor-liquid-solid three-phase fluidized bed. International Journal of Heat and Technology 34(3): 537-544. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.340327

[13] Snider DM. (2001). An incompressible three dimensional multiphase particle-in-cell model for dense particle flows. Journal of computational physics 170(2): 523-549. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2001.6747

[14] Qiu GZ, Ye JM, Wang HG, Wang XF, Wang FJ, Sun YK, Nie L. (2016). CPFD simulation of gas-solids flow in annular combustion chamber of large-scale circulating fluidized bed. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences 33(2): 18-222.

[15] Amarasinghe WS, Jayarathna CK, Ahangama BS, Moldestad BME, Tokheim LA. (2017). Experimental study and CFD modelling of minimum fluidization velocity for geldart A, B and D particles. International Journal of Modeling & Optimization, 7(3): 152-156. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJMO.2017.V7.575

[16] Chladek J, Jayarathna CK, Moldestad BME, et al. (2018). Fluidized bed classification of particles of different size and density. Chemical Engineering Science 177: 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.11.042