© 2022 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
OPEN ACCESS
Constructed wetlands (CW) can be considered an efficient municipal wastewater treatment technology, suitable to be used on a local level in both rural and urban environments. This technology is popular and normally used in Europe having the attributes of a success story – cheap in investment and simple in operation. Nevertheless, the transfer of this technology to developing countries is a challenge of some kind, the main reason being a different technological and cultural context there. The paper discusses the implementation process of CWs in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, the East. The concept of diffusion of innovation is used as the guideline, namely two of its perspectives – motivation of end-users to implement the technology, and the way the information about the technology is spread. Empirical data were obtained by use of semi-standardized interviews with the three types of stakeholders involved, the end-users themselves, local authorities, and pertinent NGOs. On this basis, three main reasons (moti- vations) to implement CWs for municipal sewage water treatment were found, which can appear in a combination – environmental-religious, pragmatical and prestigious. In parallel, three communication channels were identified which can be metaphorically named professional enlightenment, peer influence (or exempla trahunt) and direct external aid.
communities, constructed wetlands, diffusion of innovation, land management, Nepal, pollution control, water management
[1] Shrestha, R. R., Application of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Nepal – Dissertation Thesis, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria. 1999.
[2] Roka, R. B., Dongol, R., Kalavrouziotis, I. K., Historical Development of Wastewater Management in Kathmandu Valley. Conference paper: 4th IWA International Symposium on Water and Wastewater Technologies in Ancient Civilization, Coimbra, Portugal, 2016.
[3] Green, H., Poh, S. C., Richards, A., Wastewater treatment in Kathmandu, Nepal, Master Thesis: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge: USA, 2003.
[4] Shrestha, N., Lamsal, A., Regmi, R. K., Mishra, B. K. (2015): Current Status of Water Environment in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Water and Urban Initiative Working Paper Series, United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability. Available online: http://collections.unu.edu/view/UNU:2852
[5] Boukalova, Z., Teˇšitel, J. & Gurung, D. B., Nature-based water treatment solutions and their successful implementation in Kathamndu Valley, Nepal. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, vol. 242, WIT Press: Southampton and Boston, pp. 121–132, 2020.
[6] Shrestha, J., Kalu, S., Performance of DEWATS in Nepal. Journal of Environment and Public Health, 1(1): 21-26, 2017. Online available: https://www.scribd.com/document/458266773/ENPHO-Journal-V1-I1.
[7] Tuladhar, B., Shrestha, P., Shrestha, R., Decentralised wastewater management using constructed wetlands. Online available: https://es.ircwash.org/sites/default/files/Tuladhar-2008-Decentralised.pdf, 2008.
[8] WaterAid, Decentralised wastewater management using constructed wetlands in Nepal. WaterAid in Nepal, Kathmandu: Nepal, 2008.
[9] Gurung, A. and Oh, S-E., An overview of water pollution and constructed wetlands for sustainable wastewater treatment in Kathmandu Valley: a review. Scientific Research and Essays, 7(11), 1185-1194, 2012.
[10] Gurung, S. B., Geronimo, F. K. F., Lee, S., Kim, L. H., Status of constructed wetlands in Nepal: recent developments and future concerns. Journal of Wetlands Research, 19(1), 45-51, 2017.
[11] Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press, 2003.
[12] Dooley, K. E., Towards a holistic model for the diffusion of educational technologies: an integrative review of educational innovation studies. Educational Technology & Society, 2(4), 35-45, 1999.
[13] Stuart, W. D., Influence of sources of communication, user characteristics and innovation characteristics on adoption of communication technology. Dissertation Thesis, University of Kansas: Kansas, USA, 2000.
[14] Charmaz, K., Constructing grounded theory – A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publications: London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, 2006.
[15] Kielmann, K., Cataldo, F., Seeley, J., Introduction to qualitative research methodology: a training manual, produced with the support of the Department for International Development (DfID), UK, under the Evidence for Action Research Programme Consortium on HIV Treatment and Care (2006–2011), 2012.
[16] Thomas, W. I., Thomas, D. S., The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: A. A. Knopf, 1928.
[17] Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W., Introduction to the Science of Society, University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USA, 1921.
[18] Boukalová, Z., Teˇšitel, J. & Gurung D. B., Constructed wetlands implementation in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. International Journal of Environmental Impacts, 4(4), 363-374, 2021. Online available: https://www.witpress.com/elibrary/ei-volumes/4/4/2849
[19] https://enpho.org/
[20] https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629956600105
[21] Arnstein, S. R., A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–24, 1969.