Planning Long-Term Management for Historic Cities. The ROCK Integrated and Sustainable Management Plan

Planning Long-Term Management for Historic Cities. The ROCK Integrated and Sustainable Management Plan

Andrea Boeri Danila Longo Chiara Mariotti Rossella Roversi

Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Department of Architecture

Page: 
311-322
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V14-N4-311-322
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
30 November 2019
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The practice of management, although quite recent, embodies one of the major challenges for plan- ning sustainable historic cities. Environmental, climatic, social and cultural issues affecting historic contexts, make management a fundamental process in balancing sustainable development and heritage conservation over time. In this framework, the ROCK – Regeneration and Optimisation of Cultural heritage in creative and Knowledge cities – project (h2020, n. 730280) aims at developing cultural heritage-led  regeneration strategies capable of ensuring streams of long-lasting structured actions after the end of the project. Involving 10 European cities under the coordination of the municipality of Bologna with the core scientific support of the University of Bologna, this project is designing a long-term management tool and testing its innovative pathway across the EU. Thus, this paper will focus on the genesis, construction and implementation of the ROCK Integrated management Plan (IMP) as vital toolkit for developing, over time, sustainable urban procedures in the historic cities focused on the essential role of tangible and intangible heritage. Based on the UNESCO management Plans, the existing literature and on several international reference experiences, ROCK IMP embeds the research-action-research methodology that underlies the whole project. Following this innovative circular approach, a preliminary set of goals and actions were selected (research), then implemented trough pilot interventions, co-designed and co-created with local administrations, stakeholders and citizens (action), and finally updated, considering the impacts of the performed actions to recalibrate the process and build scenarios for the IMP (research). As it is an ongoing process, this paper will appraise its state of the art, highlighting the potential and criticalities and describing what has been done in the city of Bologna so far.

Keywords: 

Cultural Heritage, governance, historic cities, integrated management, long-term planning, urban sustainable regeneration

  References

[1] European Commission, Using culture to breathe new life into historic city centres, 18 June 2019. Online, https://cordis.europa.eu/news/rcn/131357/en (accessed 01 July 2019.)

[2] European Commission, Horizon 2020, Work Programme 2016–2017 – 12. Climate action, environment, resource efficiency and raw materials, 24 April 2017. Online, https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/ h2020-wp1617-climate_en.pdf (accessed 01 July 2019).

[3] ROCK Official Website. Online, https://rockproject.eu (accessed 01 July 2019).

[4] Veldpaus, L., Historic Urban Landscapes: Framing the Integration of Urban and Heritage Planning in Multilevel Governance, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven: Eindhoven, 2015.

[5] European Commission, Horizon 2020 Cultural Heritage and European Identities. List of projects 2014–2017. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Open and inclusive Societies, 2018. Online, https://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/ project_synopses/cultural_heritage_projects.pdf (accessed 01 July 2019).

[6] UNESCO, Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape, Paris, 10 November 2011. Online, https://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/activity-638-98.pdf (accessed 01 July 2019).

[7] UNESCO, Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, 1972. Online, https://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/ (accessed 04 July 2019).

[8] Jokilehto, J., Definition of Cultural Heritage. References to Documents in History. ICCROM Working Group “Heritage and Society”, 2005. Online, http://cif.icomos.org/ pdf_docs/Documents%20on%20line/Heritage%20definitions.pdf (accessed 04 July 2019).

[9] Sonkoly, G. & Vahtikari, T., Innovation in Cultural Heritage Research. For an integrated European Research Policy, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Europe in a changing world – Inclusive, innovative and reflective societies (Horizon 2020/SC6) and Cooperation Work Programme: Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities (FP7), Publications Office of the European Union in Luxembourg, 2018. doi: 10.2777/673069. Online, https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1dd62bd1- 2216-11e8-ac73-01aa75ed71a1(accessed 04 July 2019).

[10] UNESCO, ICCROM, ICOMOS, IUNC, Managing Cultural World Heritage, UNESCO World Heritage Centre – World Heritage Resource Manual: Paris, 2013. Online, https:// whc.unesco.org/document/125839 (accessed 04 July 2019).

[11] UNESCO, Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage ­Convention, UNESCO World heritage Centre: Paris, 2017. Online, https://whc.unesco. org/en/guidelines/ (accessed 04 July 2019).

[12] UNESCO, Management planning of the UNESCO World Heritage Sites. Guidelines for the development, implementation and monitoring of management plans. With the examples of Adriatic WHS, Expeditio: Kotor, 2016. Online, https://www.expoaus.org/ upload/novosti/publication_expoaus_eng_web_105355.pdf (accessed 04 July 2019).

[13] European Commission, Getting cultural heritage to work for Europe. Report on the Horizon 2020 Expert Group on Cultural Heritage, Directorate-General fro Research and Innovation, Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2015. Online, https://www.kowi.de/Portaldata/2/Resources/horizon2020/coop/H2020-ReportExpert-Group-Cultural-Heritage.pdf (accessed 05 July 2019).

[14] Council of the European Union, Conclusions on cultural heritage as a strategic resource for a sustainable Europe, Brussels, 20 May 2014. Online, https://www.consilium.europa. eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/educ/142705.pdf (accessed 05 July 2019).

[15] LOCUS Consulting Ltd, Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site ­Management Plan 2017–2024, 2017. Online, http://regeneratingliverpool.com/wpcontent/uploads/2017/07/PMD-486-Liverpool-WHS-Management-Plan-FINAL-VERSION-as-at-12-May-2017.pdf (accessed 06 July 2019).

[16] Mission site historique de Lyon - Direction des affaires culturelles, Plan de Gestion du site historique de Lyon. Inscrit sur la liste du patrimoine mondial de l’UNESCO, 2013. Online, http://whc.unesco.org/fr/documents/138552/ (accessed 06 July 2019).

[17] HERO – HERitage as Opportunity, Local Action Plan. Vilnius Old Town, 2011. Online: https://urbact.eu/sites/default/files/vilnius_action_plan.pdf (accessed 06 July 2019).

[18] Gaspari, J., Boulanger, S.O.M. & Antonini, E., Multi-Layered design strategies to adopt smart districts as urban regeneration enablers. In International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 12(8), pp. 1247–1259, 2017. Online, https://www.witpress. com/Secure/ejournals/papers/SDP120801f.pdf (accessed 06 July 2019).

[19] Council of Europe, Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society, Faro, 27 October 2005. Online, https://rm.coe.int/1680083746 (accessed 07 July 2019).