On the Biological Shape of the Polygonaceae Rheum Petiole

On the Biological Shape of the Polygonaceae Rheum Petiole

D. Pasini 

Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Page: 
39-64
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/D&NE-V3-N1-39-64
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
31 March 2008
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The petiole is a plant organ that connects the stem to the blade of a leaf. The petiole is made up of a fibrous biomaterial that consists of three integrated tissues. Each of these specializes in different functions, but they work together to provide basic needs, such as nutrient transport, food storage and plant support. From a structural viewpoint, the petiole resembles a cantilever that should resist wind torsion and gravity bending forces acting on the leaf blade. It has a solid cross-section with a grooved flattened asymmetric shape with size decreasing lengthwise. As all plant organs, the petiole morphology is developed by adaptive growth, which is the plant response to environmental stimuli. Thus, the petiole grows a shape that best optimizes the use of vital resources. This paper focuses on the structural efficiency of the shape petiole and it examines the capability of the petiole in reducing the wind drag without sagging under gravity forces. Continuum mechanics and dimensionless factors are used to model the twist-to-bend ratio. Twenty specimens of Polygonaceae Rheum rhabarbarum plants were investigated. The results are visualized on maps that contrast the petiole shape properties to those of ideal cross-sections.

Keywords: 

bending stiffness, leaf petiole, optimized shape, structural efficiency, torsional compliance, twist-to-bend ratio

  References

[1] Campbell, N.A., Reece, J.B. & Mitchell, L.G., Biology, 5th edn, Benjamin Cummings: Don Mills, 1999.

[2] Wainwright, S.A., Biggs, W.D., Currey, J.D. & Gosline, J.M., Mechanical Design in Organisms, Princeton University Press, 1982.

[3] Vogel, S., Drag and reconfi guration of broad leaves in high winds. Journal of Experimental Botany, 40, pp. 941–948, 1989.

[4] Niklas, K.J., The mechanical roles of clasping leaf sheaths: evidence from Arundinaria tecta shoots subjected to bending and twisting forces. Annals of Botany, 81, pp. 23–34, 1998.

[5] Etnier, S.A. & Vogel, S., Reorientation of daffodil followers in wind: drag reduction and torsional fl exibility. American Journal of Botany, 87, pp. 29–32, 2000.

[6] Vogel, S., Twist-to-bend ratio ratios of woody structures. Journal of Experimental Botany, 46, pp. 981–985, 1995.

[7] Vogel, S., Drag and fl exibility in sessile organisms. Am. Zool., 24, pp. 37–44, 1984.

[8] Vogel, S., Comparative Biomechanics: Life’s Physical World, Princeton University Press, 2003.

[9] Koehl, M.A.R., Effects of sea anemones on the fl ow forces they encounter. Journal of Experimental Botany, 69, pp. 87–105, 1977.

[10] Koehl, M.A.R., Mechanical organization of cantilever-like sessile organisms: sea anemones. Journal of Experimental Botany, 69, pp. 127–142, 1977.

[11] Ennos, A.R., The mechanics of the fl ower stem of the sedge Carex acutiformis. Annals of Botany, 72(2), pp. 123–127, 1993.

[12] Ennos, A.R., Spatz, H.C. & Speck, T., The functional morphology of the petioles of the banana, Musa textilis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51(353), pp. 2085–93, 2000.

[13] Etnier, S.A., Flexural and torsional stiffness in multi-jointed biological beams. Biological Bulletin, 200(1), pp. 1–8, 2001.

[14] Etnier, S.A., Twisting and bending of biological beams: distribution of biological beams in a stiffness mechanospace. Biological Bulletin; 205(1), pp. 36–46, 2003.

[15] Vogel, S., Twist-to-bend ratios of woody structures. Journal of Experimental Botany, 46, pp. 981–985, 1995.

[16] Niklas, K.J., The elastic moduli and mechanics of Populus tremuloides (Salicaceae) petioles in bending and torsion. American Journal of Botany, 78, pp. 989–996, 1991.

[17] Harder, D.L., Hurd, C.L. & Speck, T., Comparison of mechanical properties of four large, wave-exposed seaweeds. American Journal of Botany, 93(10), pp. 1426–1432, 2006.

[18] Gallenmüller, F., Müller, U., Rowe, N.P. & Speck, T., The growth form of Croton pullei (Euphorbiaceae) – functional morphology and biomechanics of a neotropical liana. Plant Biol., 3, pp. 50–61, 2001.

[19] Niklas, K.J., Plant Biomechanics: An Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function, University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, 1992.

[20] Pasini, D. & Mirjalili, V., The optimized shape of a leaf petiole. 3rd International Conference on Design and Nature, Wessex, UK, pp. 35–45, May 24–26, 2006.

[21] Pasini, D., Shape Transformers for Material and Shape Selection of Lightweight Beams, Journal of Materials and Design, Vol. 28(7), pp. 2071–2079, 2007.

[22] Pasini, D., Material and shape selection for optimizing fl exural vibrations in multilayered resonators. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 15(6), pp. 1745–1758, 2006.

[23] Pasini, D., Burgess, S.C. & Smith, D.J., A method for selecting macro-scale structures with axially loaded members. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design, 3, pp. 185–199, 2006.

[24] Mirjalili, V. & Pasini, D., Shape effi ciency maps for optimum shape selection in torsion stiffness design. 18th IASTED International Conference on Modelling and Simulation, May 30–June 1, Montreal, 2007.

[25] Loria, G., Spezielle algebraische und transscendente ebene kurven: Theorie and Geshichte, B.G. Teubner: Leipzig, 1902.

[26] Gardner, M., The superellipse: a curve that lies between the ellipse and the rectangle. Scientifi c American, 213, pp. 222–234, 1965.

[27] Gridgeman, N.T., Lamé ovals. Mathematical Gazette, 54, p. 31, 1970.

[28] Gibson, C.G., Elementary Geometry of Algebraic Curves, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.

[29] Jaklic, A., Leonardis, A. & Solina, F., Segmentation and Recovery of Superquadrics, Kluwer Academics Publishers: Dordrecht, Boston, London, 2000.

[30] Thomson, D’A.,W., On Growth and Form, Cambridge University, Press: Cambridge, UK, 1917.

[31] Gielis, J., A generic geometric transformation that unifi es a wide range of natural and abstract shapes. American Journal of Botany, 90, pp. 333–338, 2003.

[32] Gielis, J., Superquadrics with rational and irrational symmetry. SM’03, June 16–20, pp. 16–20, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2003.

[33] Peterson, I., A geometric superformula. Science News, 163(18), 2003.

[34] Meyers, M.A., Lin, A.Y.M., Seki, Y., Chen, P.-Y., Kad, B.K. & Bodde S., Structural biological composites: an overview, JOM, 58(7), pp. 35–41, 2006.

[35] Burgess, S.C., Multifunctioning and multi-optimisation in feathers. International Journal of Design and Nature, 1, pp. 1–10, 2007.

[36] McMahon, T.A., Size and shape in biology. Science, 179, pp. 1201–1204, 1973.

[37] Mattheck, C., Engineering components grow like trees. Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, 67, pp. 1661–1686, 1989.

[38] Mattheck, C., Trees: The Mechanical Design, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1991.

[39] Gere, J.M. & Timoshenko, S.P., Mechanics of Materials, Brooks/Cole Engineering Division: Monterey, CA, 1984.

[40] Boresi, A.P. & Schmidt, R.J., Advanced Mechanics of Materials, John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2003.

[41] Sidenbladh, G., Stockholm: a planned city. Cities: Their Origin, Growth and Human Impact, WH Freeman: San Francisco, 1973.