© 2021 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
OPEN ACCESS
Particle size distribution is one of the most important physical properties of a particulate sample. Traditional particle-sizing methods to estimate a geometrical particle size distribution employ a sieve analysis (or gradation test), which entails filtering the particles through a series of sieves and measuring the weight remaining on each sieve to estimate the number-weighted particle size distribution. However, these two quantities have the same value only if particles are perfectly spherical and round. On the other hand, a particle sizer such as the Malvern particle size analyzer, which uses laser diagnostics to measure the particle sizes, can be a hefty investment. Alternatively, imaging techniques can be applied to estimate the size of these particles by scaling a reference dimension to the pixel size, which in turn is used to estimate the size of the visible particles. The focus of this work is to present a simple methodology using a DSLR camera and an illuminated LED panel to generate enough contrast. Using the camera and lens properties, the scale, or size, of any image can be obtained based on the mounting distance of the camera with respect to the target. An analysis tool was developed in MATLAB where the images are processed automatically based on the prescribed camera and lens properties embedded within the same image file and requiring the user to only input the mounting distance of the camera. So far, results show a positive agreement when comparing to measurements using ImageJ imaging tools and a sieve analysis. Future tests will analyze different particle sizes and types, as well as using a Malvern particle size analyzer to corroborate the results.
imaging methods, particle analysis, particle sizing
[1] Silva, Ana FT, et al., Particle sizing measurements in pharmaceutical applications: Comparison of in-process methods versus off-line methods.European Journal of Phar- maceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 85(3), pp. 1006–1018, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ejpb.2013.03.032
[2] Wajheeuddin, M. & Enamul Hossain, M. An experimental study on particle sizing of natural substitutes for drilling fluid applications. Journal of Nature Science and Sus- tainable Technology, 8(2), pp. 1–14, 2014.
[3] Black, D.L., McQuay, M.Q. & Bonin, M.P. Laser-based techniques for particle-size measurement: a review of sizing methods and their industrial applications.Progress in Energy andCombustion Science, 22(3), pp. 267–306, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/ s0360-1285(96)00008-1
[4] Fonseca, J., et al., Non-invasive characterization of particle morphology of natu- ral sands.Soils and Foundations, 52(4), pp. 712–722, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sandf.2012.07.011
[5] Alsaba, M., et al., Updated criterion to select particle size distribution of lost circulation materials for an effective fracture sealing.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineer- ing, 149, pp. 641–648, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.10.027
[6] Yu, X., Y. F. & Lu, S., Characterization of the pore structure and cementing substances of soil aggregates by a combination of synchrotron radiation X-ray micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy. European Journal of Soil Science, 68(1), pp. 66–79, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12399
[7] Karg, M.C.H., et al., Expanding particle size distribution and morphology of alumin- ium-silicon powders for Laser Beam Melting by dry coating with silica nanoparticles. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 264, pp. 155–171, 2019. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.08.045
[8] Olson, E., Particle shape factors and their use in image analysis part 1: theory. Journal of GXP Compliance, 15(3), p. 85, 2011.
[9] Innopharma Labs, A Comparison of the Particle Sizing Techniques of Sieve Analy- sis and Eyecon. White Paper. Accessed: 6/2/2021. https://www.innopharmalabs.com/ sites/default/files/a_comparison_of_the_particle_sizing_techniques_of_sieve_analy- sis_and_eyecontm_mail_content.pdf
[10] Ho, C.K., et al., Characterization of particle and heat losses from falling particle receiv- ers. Energy Sustainability. Vol. 59094. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2019.
[11] Ortega, J.D., et al., Particle Plume Velocities Extracted from High-Speed Thermograms through Particle Image Velocimetry. ASME 2021 15th International Conference on Energy Sustainability, ES 2021, 1–6.
[12] Ortega, J.D., et al., A Non-Intrusive Particle Temperature Measurement Methodology using Thermogram and Visible-Light Image Sets. ASME 2021 15th International Con- ference on Energy Sustainability, ES 2021, 1–6.
[13] Claff, B., Field-of-view of lenses by focal length. Nikonians. Camera Reviews, Lens Reviews. Online, https://www.nikonians.org/reviews/fov-tables. Accessed on: June 1 2021.
[14] Eddins, S., The Watershed Transform: Strategies for Image Segmentation. Technical Articles and Newsletters, MathWorks. Online, https://www.mathworks.com/company/ newsletters/articles/the-watershed-transform-strategies-for-image-segmentation.html. Accessed on: June 1 2021.
[15] An Introduction to Particle Characterization. AZO Materials, October 7, 2019. Online, https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=18502. Accessed on: June 2 2021.
[16] Proppant Tables/2015. WorldOil, Media, Carbo. Online https://www.worldoil.com/ media/3025/proppant-tables-2015.pdf. Accessed on: June 2 2021.